PISA Equations and Inequalities Making Mathematics Accessible to All -  Oecd

PISA Equations and Inequalities Making Mathematics Accessible to All (eBook)

(Autor)

eBook Download: EPUB
2016 | 1. Auflage
224 Seiten
OECD Publishing (Verlag)
978-92-64-25934-8 (ISBN)
Systemvoraussetzungen
43,85 inkl. MwSt
  • Download sofort lieferbar
  • Zahlungsarten anzeigen

More than ever, students need to engage with mathematical concepts, think quantitatively and analytically, and communicate using mathematics. All these skills are central to a young person’s preparedness to tackle problems that arise at work and in life beyond the classroom. But the reality is that many students are not familiar with basic mathematics concepts and, at school, only practice routine tasks that do not improve their ability to think quantitatively and solve real-life, complex problems.



How can we break this pattern? This report, based on results from PISA 2012, shows that one way forward is to ensure that all students spend more “engaged” time learning core mathematics concepts and solving challenging mathematics tasks. The opportunity to learn mathematics content – the time students spend learning mathematics topics and practising maths tasks at school – can accurately predict mathematics literacy. Differences in students’ familiarity with mathematics concepts explain a substantial share of performance disparities in PISA between socio-economically advantaged and disadvantaged students. Widening access to mathematics content can raise average levels of achievement and, at the same time, reduce inequalities in education and in society at large.


More than ever, students need to engage with mathematical concepts, think quantitatively and analytically, and communicate using mathematics. All these skills are central to a young person's preparedness to tackle problems that arise at work and in life beyond the classroom. But the reality is that many students are not familiar with basic mathematics concepts and, at school, only practice routine tasks that do not improve their ability to think quantitatively and solve real-life, complex problems. How can we break this pattern? This report, based on results from PISA 2012, shows that one way forward is to ensure that all students spend more "e;engaged"e; time learning core mathematics concepts and solving challenging mathematics tasks. The opportunity to learn mathematics content - the time students spend learning mathematics topics and practising maths tasks at school - can accurately predict mathematics literacy. Differences in students' familiarity with mathematics concepts explain a substantial share of performance disparities in PISA between socio-economically advantaged and disadvantaged students. Widening access to mathematics content can raise average levels of achievement and, at the same time, reduce inequalities in education and in society at large.

Chapter 1. Why Access to Mathematics Matters and How it Can be Measured1


This chapter discusses the importance of mathematics knowledge for acquiring numeracy skills and developing problem-solving abilities. It presents the concept of “opportunity to learn” and argues that measuring opportunity to learn is of critical importance for international comparisons of curricula and student performance. An overview of the data on opportunity to learn in PISA 2012 shows that education systems differ greatly in the degree to which students are exposed to mathematics concepts and also in the way mathematics problems are formulated and presented to students.

The teacher of mathematics has a great opportunity. If he fills his allotted time with drilling his students with routine operations he kills their interest, hampers their intellectual development, and misuses his opportunity. But if he challenges the curiosity of his students by setting them problems proportionate to their knowledge, and helps them to solve their problems with stimulating questions, he may give them a taste for, and some means of, independent thinking (Polya, 1973).

Countries repeatedly reform their mathematics curricula to make sure they are relevant to students and societies (Cai and Ni, 2011; Usiskin and Willmore, 2008). Over time, reforms have been based on various factors, including on two observations: both national and international assessments proved that too many students were completing compulsory schooling without being able to use basic mathematics; and the evidence often showed that disadvantaged students were relegated to mathematics courses that were poorer in content and quality – a violation of the principle that all students should be exposed to high-quality instruction.

What the data tell us


  • Numeracy skills are used daily in many jobs and are important for a wide range of outcomes in adult life, from successful employment to good health and civic participation.

  • In 2012, the average 15-year-old student in an OECD country spent 3 hours and 32 minutes per week in regular mathematics lessons at school; 13 minutes more per week than the average student did in 2003.

  • On average across OECD countries, less than 30% of students reported to know well the concept of arithmetic mean; less than 50% of students reported to know well the concepts of polygon and divisor.

  • There are large international differences in students’ average familiarity with algebraic and geometric concepts. Students in Macao-China reported the most familiarity with algebraic concepts, while students in Shanghai-China had the most familiarity with geometric concepts.

  • There is only a weak correlation between students’ exposure to applied mathematics and to pure mathematics at the system level, suggesting that the two methods of instruction rarely complement each other.

International data on students’ classroom experiences with mathematics are illuminating because they show that policy makers and experts in charge of reform tend to think about mathematics differently than students do (Schoenfeld, 1983; Brown et al., 2008). For the skilled mathematician, solving a mathematics problem is an exciting process of discovery and mental training; for many students towards the end of compulsory education, mathematics is a well-defined set of facts that must be rehearsed until it is learned (Echazarra et al., 2016).

Notwithstanding the good intentions of mathematics teachers, weaker students who are underexposed to the practice of mathematics problem-solving – in many cases, these are students from disadvantaged families – never get an opportunity to develop a “taste for, and some means of, independent thinking” (Polya, 1973). Given the importance of mathematics reasoning for life, mathematics curricula need to be enriching and challenging also for those students who do not plan to continue their formal education after compulsory schooling and for those who have fallen behind, in knowledge and self-confidence, since primary school.

What these results mean for policy


  • All students need mathematics for their adult life. Reducing socio-economic inequalities in access to mathematics content is thus an important policy lever for increasing social mobility.

  • In many countries, the small share of students who reported that they know well and understand basic concepts signals the need to increase the effectiveness of mathematics teaching by focusing on key mathematics ideas and making more connections across topics.

  • The large differences between the intended, the implemented and the achieved curriculum suggest the importance of regularly collecting data on students’ exposure to mathematics content.

  • International comparisons of curriculum standards, frameworks and teaching material can help countries to design reforms that increase the coherence of the mathematics curriculum.

Achieving equitable opportunities to learn involves not only the content and flexibility of the curriculum, but also how students from different socio-economic backgrounds progress through the system, how well learning materials match students’ skills, and how teachers understand and manage the learning needs of diverse students. No matter how detailed and flexible the curriculum might be, mathematics teachers need to make difficult trade-offs to design mathematics lessons that are both accessible to weak students and challenging to bright ones.

This report uses data from PISA 2012 to describe students’ opportunity to learn mathematics, including mathematics instruction time and the mathematics content to which students are exposed. It illustrates how students’, schools’ and systems’ characteristics interact in affecting students’ capacity to use the mathematics knowledge they acquire at school to solve real-world problems. Figure 1.1 shows the analytical framework of the report. This chapter introduces the concept of opportunity to learn, describes the metrics on content coverage and exposure developed for PISA 2012, and discusses how these metrics capture international differences in mathematics curricula. The second chapter takes one step back to examine student-, school- and system-level variables that can explain how these differences arise. The third chapter looks at how time spent on pure and applied mathematics tasks affects student performance in PISA, while the fourth chapter focuses on the relationship between content exposure and students’ attitudes towards mathematics, such as mathematics self-concept and anxiety, which are closely related to mathematics performance. The fifth chapter discusses the policy implications of the preceding analyses.

Figure 1.1. The analytical framework

THE IMPORTANCE OF MATHEMATICS SKILLS IN EVERYDAY LIFE


Mathematics teachers are accustomed to answering questions about the usefulness of what they teach. Not only students, but also parents and policy makers often worry about a mismatch between what is taught at school and the quantitative skills needed in everyday life. While it might be difficult to explain why students spend so much time learning algebra and geometry, mathematics is a core part of the curriculum for virtually every secondary student in the world. Is this justified? Should all students learn a significant amount of mathematics beyond what is needed to make simple calculations?

One of the rationales used to explain the central role of mathematics in global education curricula is the idea, dating back to Plato, that mathematics education enhances higher-order thinking skills. Those who are good at mathematics tend to be good thinkers, and those who are trained in mathematics learn to be good thinkers. According to this view, mathematics should be taught for its own sake, rather than to serve more concrete and practical aims.

Beyond the effects of mathematics training on some abstract mental faculties, there is a more intuitive and practical benefit from mastering mathematics at a reasonably good level: mathematics is a gatekeeper. The mathematics studied at school is the main entry point to quantitative literacy, and without solid quantitative skills a person cannot do many jobs. Exam scores in mathematics are, in fact, important factors in determining acceptance into higher education programmes leading to scientific and professional careers.

The demand for STEM (science, technology, engineering and mathematics) professionals has been continuously rising over recent years. For example, employment of STEM professionals across the European Union was approximately 12% higher in 2013 than it was in 2000, notwithstanding the effects of the economic crisis (European Parliament, 2015). Moreover, organisations compete for talent, and many of them now use rigorous quantitative assessments that test both verbal and mathematical ability when selecting employees (Schmitt, 2013).

The value of having quantitative skills has risen over recent years. Our societies are “drenched with data” (Steen, 2001), and the level of number skills needed to carry on daily life activities has increased. Understanding concepts such as “exponential growth” or “line of best fit”, assessing the rate at which a variable is changing or knowing what to expect from the flip of a coin have become important for making informed judgements and choices. Computers have reduced the need for mechanical calculations, but the importance of understanding numbers has...

Erscheint lt. Verlag 20.6.2016
Sprache englisch
Themenwelt Sozialwissenschaften Pädagogik
Wirtschaft Betriebswirtschaft / Management Allgemeines / Lexika
ISBN-10 92-64-25934-1 / 9264259341
ISBN-13 978-92-64-25934-8 / 9789264259348
Haben Sie eine Frage zum Produkt?
EPUBEPUB (Adobe DRM)

Kopierschutz: Adobe-DRM
Adobe-DRM ist ein Kopierschutz, der das eBook vor Mißbrauch schützen soll. Dabei wird das eBook bereits beim Download auf Ihre persönliche Adobe-ID autorisiert. Lesen können Sie das eBook dann nur auf den Geräten, welche ebenfalls auf Ihre Adobe-ID registriert sind.
Details zum Adobe-DRM

Dateiformat: EPUB (Electronic Publication)
EPUB ist ein offener Standard für eBooks und eignet sich besonders zur Darstellung von Belle­tristik und Sach­büchern. Der Fließ­text wird dynamisch an die Display- und Schrift­größe ange­passt. Auch für mobile Lese­geräte ist EPUB daher gut geeignet.

Systemvoraussetzungen:
PC/Mac: Mit einem PC oder Mac können Sie dieses eBook lesen. Sie benötigen eine Adobe-ID und die Software Adobe Digital Editions (kostenlos). Von der Benutzung der OverDrive Media Console raten wir Ihnen ab. Erfahrungsgemäß treten hier gehäuft Probleme mit dem Adobe DRM auf.
eReader: Dieses eBook kann mit (fast) allen eBook-Readern gelesen werden. Mit dem amazon-Kindle ist es aber nicht kompatibel.
Smartphone/Tablet: Egal ob Apple oder Android, dieses eBook können Sie lesen. Sie benötigen eine Adobe-ID sowie eine kostenlose App.
Geräteliste und zusätzliche Hinweise

Buying eBooks from abroad
For tax law reasons we can sell eBooks just within Germany and Switzerland. Regrettably we cannot fulfill eBook-orders from other countries.

Mehr entdecken
aus dem Bereich
Strengthening Cybersecurity Through Proper Training

von Jerrod Pickering

eBook Download (2023)
Distributed By Ingram Spark (Verlag)
7,49