Preventing Prenatal Harm
Should the State Intervene?
Seiten
2013
|
Softcover reprint of the original 1st ed. 1991
Springer (Verlag)
978-94-017-3745-6 (ISBN)
Springer (Verlag)
978-94-017-3745-6 (ISBN)
The issues explored in this book have unfortunately come to be known as 'maternal-fetal conflicts'. But I am trying to look at them in a new - and I hope more fruitful - way. I would like to thank the other participants in the Hastings Center's maternal-fetal project - especially those who disageed with me - for being so thought-provoking.
The issues explored in this book have unfortunately come to be known as 'maternal-fetal conflicts'. The phrase is unsatisfactory because it is misleading: It places the emphasis on the well-being of the fetus instead of on the born child (who will bear the burden of any harm done prenatally); it assumes a conflict between a pregnant women and her offspring (while the issue is usually more complex and more broadly based); and it incorrectly implies that all pregnant women are appropriately regarded as mothers. For these reasons, I have chosen to avoid the phrase 'matern- fetal conflict' altogether, and will instead speak in terms of 'preventable prenatal harm'. I mention this at the outset, for those of you familiar with 'maternal-fetal conflicts' who might be wondering if I am addressing the same issues. Yes. But I am trying to look at them in a new - and I hope more fruitful - way. I would like to thank the other participants in the Hastings Center's maternal-fetal project - especially those who disageed with me - for being so thought-provoking. And I owe a lasting debt of gratitude to Henry Ruth and Allen Buchanan for their invaluable counsel.
The issues explored in this book have unfortunately come to be known as 'maternal-fetal conflicts'. The phrase is unsatisfactory because it is misleading: It places the emphasis on the well-being of the fetus instead of on the born child (who will bear the burden of any harm done prenatally); it assumes a conflict between a pregnant women and her offspring (while the issue is usually more complex and more broadly based); and it incorrectly implies that all pregnant women are appropriately regarded as mothers. For these reasons, I have chosen to avoid the phrase 'matern- fetal conflict' altogether, and will instead speak in terms of 'preventable prenatal harm'. I mention this at the outset, for those of you familiar with 'maternal-fetal conflicts' who might be wondering if I am addressing the same issues. Yes. But I am trying to look at them in a new - and I hope more fruitful - way. I would like to thank the other participants in the Hastings Center's maternal-fetal project - especially those who disageed with me - for being so thought-provoking. And I owe a lasting debt of gratitude to Henry Ruth and Allen Buchanan for their invaluable counsel.
Arguments in Favor of Coercing a Pregnant Woman to Act in the Interests of her Future Child.- Arguments against Legally Requiring a Pregnant Woman to Act in the Interests of her Future Child.- Practical Applications.
Reihe/Serie | Clinical Medical Ethics ; 3 |
---|---|
Zusatzinfo | VIII, 156 p. |
Verlagsort | Dordrecht |
Sprache | englisch |
Maße | 210 x 279 mm |
Themenwelt | Geisteswissenschaften ► Philosophie ► Allgemeines / Lexika |
Geisteswissenschaften ► Philosophie ► Ethik | |
Medizin / Pharmazie ► Allgemeines / Lexika | |
Wirtschaft ► Volkswirtschaftslehre | |
ISBN-10 | 94-017-3745-2 / 9401737452 |
ISBN-13 | 978-94-017-3745-6 / 9789401737456 |
Zustand | Neuware |
Haben Sie eine Frage zum Produkt? |
Mehr entdecken
aus dem Bereich
aus dem Bereich
Gesundheitsschutz, Selbstbestimmungsrechte, Rechtspolitik
Buch | Softcover (2024)
Kohlhammer (Verlag)
39,00 €
Jenseits von Identität | Ausgezeichnet mit dem Leipziger Buchpreis …
Buch | Softcover (2023)
Ullstein Taschenbuch Verlag
13,99 €