Law and Intangible Cultural Heritage in the City

Sara Gwendolyn Ross holds a PhD in Law from Osgoode Hall Law School, an LLM from the University of Ottawa, and both a BCL and LLB with a Major in Commercial Negotiation and Dispute Resolution from McGill University. She is a member of the Law Society of Ontario, and from 2018-20, she was both a SSHRC Postdoctoral Fellow and Killam Postdoctoral Laureate at the Peter A. Allard School of Law of the University of British Columbia. Her doctoral and postdoctoral research focussed on the intersection between law and culture in the city, using the novel methodology Urban Legal Anthropology.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

INTRODUCTION

CHAPTER ONE: THEORIES OF VALUE, CULTURE AND CULTURAL SPACES IN THE CITY

I. INTRODUCING USE-VALUE VERSUS EXCHANGE-VALUE IN THE CITY

II. CULTURE IN THE CITY: WHAT IT IS AND WHY IT MATTERS

III. RECALIBRATING THE CALCULATION OF BOURDIEUSEAN CULTURAL CAPITAL IN THE CITY

IV. RELATIONALLY VULNERABLE CLAIMS TO HIGH USE-VALUE SPACES OF COMMUNITY CULTURAL AND SUBCULTURAL WEALTH

V. THE INTERNATIONAL RIGHT TO CULTURE AND CULTURE IN THE CITY AS ENSHRINED IN INTERNATIONAL LEGAL FRAMEWORKS

VI. OTHER LEGAL TOOLS FOR PROTECTING THE RIGHT TO CULTURE AND INTANGIBLE CULTURE IN THE CITY

VII. RESPECTING "DIVERSITY" VERSUS DIVERSITY IN CITIES AND CULTURE: BUEN VIVIR AND MOVING TOWARDS AN EQUALITY OF DIFFERENCES

VIII. THEORIES OF HERITAGE, PROPERTY, USE, AND SPACE, AND SUBALTERN COSMOPOLITANISM TO ACHIEVE MORE EQUITABLE TREATMENT FOR PEOPLE IN THE CITY

IX. THE COMMODIFICATION OF CULTURE, REIFICATION OF EXCHANGE-VALUES, AND BARRIERS TO MEANINGFUL ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF (INTANGIBLE) CULTURAL HERITAGE VALUE, COMMUNITY (SUB)CULTURAL WEALTH, AND USE-VALUE IN THE CITY

CHAPTER TWO: METHODOLOGIES

I. OVERVIEW OF METHODS AND APPROACHES

II. THEORY AND METHODOLOGY OR METHODOLOGY WITH THEORY: INTERDISCIPLINARITY AND URBAN LEGAL ANTHROPOLOGY

III. AN URBAN LEGAL ANTHROPOLOGY AND ETHNOGRAPHIC METHODOLOGY FOR SUBALTERN COSMOPOLITANISM AND COUNTERHEGEMONIC LEGALITY

IV. REFLEXIVITY IN ANTHROPOLOGY AND ETHNOGRAPHY AND INSTITUTIONAL ETHNOGRAPHY METHODOLOGY AS GUIDANCE

V. PARTICIPANT OBSERVATION, INFORMANT ENGAGEMENT, AND THE "WRITING UP" OF FINDINGS

VI. CASE STUDY SITE SELECTION

VII. VIRTUAL COMMUNITIES, VIRTUAL NETWORKS, AND SOCIAL MEDIA

CHAPTER THREE: TORONTO - MUSIC CITY?

I. CREATIVE-CITY INSPIRED REDEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORKS AND THE MUSIC CITY

II. WHAT IS A "MUSIC CITY" AND HOW DOES A CITY LIKE TORONTO BECOME ONE?

III. MUSIC CITIES, HERITAGE PRESERVATION, AND TENSIONS BETWEEN USE-VALUES AND EXCHANGE-VALUES

CHAPTER FOUR: CASE STUDY - WATERFRONT DEVELOPMENT, THE GUVERNMENT, AND DRUM ‘N’ BASS

I. BACKGROUND: A (VERY) BRIEF HISTORY OF DRUM ‘N’ BASS, ELECTRONIC DANCE MUSIC, AND "LIVE" ELECTRONIC MUSIC

II. THE GUVERNMENT: HISTORY, COMMUNITY, SPACE, AND USE

III. OTHER DISPLACEMENT THREATS AND THE IMPORTANCE OF NIGHTTIME MUSIC AND DANCE SPACES

IV. POST-GUVERNMENT AND THE ONGOING POST-INDUSTRIAL SHIFT: WHERE DO THE DISPLACED GO?

V. TORONTO’S WATERFRONT DEVELOPMENT

CHAPTER FIVE: CASE STUDY - THE SILVER DOLLAR ROOM AND COMFORT ZONE

I. BACKGROUND DESCRIPTIONS

II. SILVER DOLLAR ROOM: REDEVELOPMENT THREATS, HERITAGE PRESERVATION, AND READING IN INTANGIBILITY INTO EXISTING HERITAGE LEGISLATION

III. DISPLACED SPACE AND COMMUNITY

CHAPTER SIX: CASE STUDY - BRUNSWICK HOUSE, ALBERT’S HALL, AND THE MATADOR

I. YE OLDE BRUNSWICK HOUSE AND ALBERT’S HALL: DESCRIPTION, HISTORY, VALUE, AND IMPORTANCE

II. THE MATADOR: BACKGROUND, DESCRIPTION, HISTORY, VALUE, AND IMPORTANCE

III. FURTHER BARRIERS TO ATTAINING A LICENSE FOR A "NIGHTCLUB" OR "ENTERTAINMENT FACILITY"

CHAPTER SEVEN: TOWARDS A COUNTERHEGEMONIC USE OF HEGEMONIC LEGAL TOOLS FOR PROTECTING SPACES OF HIGH USE-VALUE AND COMMUNITY CULTURAL WEALTH

I. COUNTERHEGEMONIC POTENTIAL OF HERITAGE MANAGEMENT TOOLS

II. PRECARIOUS PROPERTY AND CREATIVE PLACEKEEPING STRATEGIES: NEIGHBOURHOOD DYNAMICS, NUISANCE, OWNERSHIP VERSUS TENANT/OPERATOR, AND ZONING DEBACLES

III. TOKENISTIC CONSULTATION, PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT, AND TORONTO’S MUSIC CITY STRATEGY

CONCLUSION