Hot Contention, Cool Abstention
Oxford University Press Inc (Verlag)
978-0-19-069391-6 (ISBN)
Bridging the psychology literature on reasoning and the political science literature on protest, this book systematically traces how decisions about participating in the Arab Spring were made. It shows that decisions to join the uprisings were "hot," meaning they were based on positive emotions, while decisions to stay at home were "cool," meaning they were based on safety considerations. Hot Contention, Cool Abstention adds to the extensive literature on political uprisings, offering insights on how and why movements start, stall, and evolve.
Stephanie Dornschneider is Assistant Professor in the School of Politics and International Relations at University College Dublin. She holds a PhD from the Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies in Geneva, as well as an MA in International Relations and a Diploma in Middle East Studies from the American University in Cairo.
Chapter 1: An Extraordinary Experience
Chapter 2: Similar States, Opposite Outcomes: Egypt and Morocco
Chapter 3: Identifying Beliefs and Inferences
Chapter 4: Tracing Reasoning Processes
Chapter 5: Hot Contention, Cool Abstention
Chapter 6: Conclusions
Bibliography
Appendices
Appendix 1: The sample
Appendix 2: Beliefs identified by the qualitative analysis
Appendix 3: z-scores
Appendix 4: Minimum sets of beliefs
Erscheinungsdatum | 20.01.2021 |
---|---|
Reihe/Serie | Series in Political Psychology |
Verlagsort | New York |
Sprache | englisch |
Maße | 241 x 160 mm |
Gewicht | 975 g |
Themenwelt | Geisteswissenschaften ► Psychologie ► Sozialpsychologie |
Sozialwissenschaften ► Politik / Verwaltung | |
ISBN-10 | 0-19-069391-6 / 0190693916 |
ISBN-13 | 978-0-19-069391-6 / 9780190693916 |
Zustand | Neuware |
Haben Sie eine Frage zum Produkt? |
aus dem Bereich