Evidential Legal Reasoning

Jordi Ferrer-Beltrán is full professor of Legal Philosophy and director of the Chair of Legal Culture at the University of Girona. He is co-editor of Quaestio Facti, International Journal on Evidential Legal Reasoning and member of the International Association of Procedural Law and of the Council of the International Association of Evidence Science. Carmen Vázquez Rojas is Associate Professor of Legal Philosophy at the University of Girona. She is academic coordinator of the Master's Degree on Evidentiary Reasoning at the University of Girona and the Università degli Studi di Genova. She is a member of the editing committee of Quaestio Facti, International Journal on Evidential Legal Reasoning. Member of the Council of the International Association of Evidence Science.

1. Evidence as a multi-disciplinary field: What do the law and the discipline of law have to offer? William Twining; 2. New directions for evidence science, complex adaptative systems and a possibly unprovable hypothesis about human flourishing Ronald J. Allen; 3. The transformation of Chinese evidence theories and system: From objectivity to relevancy Baosheng Zhang and Ping Yang; 4. Truth finding and the mirage of inquisitorial process Adrian A. S. Zuckerman; 5. Evidential remedies for procedural rights violations: Comparative criminal evidence law and empirical research Sarah Summers; 6. Common law evidence and the common law of human rights: Towards a harmonic convergence? John Jackson; 7. Group-deliberative virtues and legal epistemology Amalia Amaya; 8. On probatory ostension and inference Giovanni Tuzet; 9. Inferences in judicial decisions about facts Michele Taruffo; 10. Silence as evidence Hock Lai Ho; 11. Sanctions for acts or sanctions for actors? Frederick Schauer; 12. From institutional to epistemic authority. Rethinking court-appointed experts Carmen Vázquez; 13. Latent justice: Fingerprint evidence and the limits of Adversarialism in England, Australia and New Zealand Gary Edmond; 14. Prevention and education: The path towards better forensic science evidence Marina Gascón Abellán; 15. Evidentiary practices and risks of wrongful conviction: An empirical perspective Mauricio Duce J.; 16 Burdens of proof and choice of law Dale A. Nance; 17. Is it possible to formulate a precise and objective standard of proof? Some questions based on an argumentative approach to evidence Daniel González Lagier; 18. Prolegomena to a theory of standards of proof: The test case for state liability for undue pre-trial detention Jordi Ferrer Beltrán.