European Competition Law Annual 2011

Philip Lowe is a Non-Executive Director of the UK Competition and Markets Authority. He was Director-General of DG Competition from 2002 to 2010, and Director-General of DG Energy from 2010 to 2013. During his tenure at the European Commission from 1973 to 2013 he also held several other senior administrative posts. Mel Marquis is Part-time Professor of Law at the European University Institute and Professore a contratto at LUMSA University in Rome. He is Co-Director of the Rome Antitrust Policy Forum and an editor on the board of Mercato Concorrenza Regole. He has practised as an attorney in the United States and Belgium.

Perchance to dream: Well Integrated Public and Private Antitrust Enforcement in the European Union
Mel Marquis
Part I Designing a Balanced System: Damages, Deterrence, Leniency and Litigants' Rights
I Andrew I Gavil, Designing Private Rights of Action for Competition Policy Systems: The Role of Interdependence andthe Advantages of a Sequential Approach
II Tom Ottervanger, Designing a Balanced System: Damages, Deterrence, Leniency and Litigants' Rights
III Scott Campbell and Tristan Feunteun, Designing a Balanced System: Damages, Deterrence, Leniency and Litigants' Rights – A Claimant's Perspective
IV Donald I Baker, Trying to Use Criminal Law and Incarceration to Punish Participants and Deter Cartels Raises Some Broad Political and Social Questions in Europe
V James S Venit and Andrew L Foster, Competition Compliance: Fines and Complementary Incentives
Part II Integrating Public and Private Enforcement in Europe: Legal and Jurisdictional Issues
I Fred Louis, Promoting Private Antitrust Enforcement: Remember Article 102
II Jochen Burrichter and Enno Ahlenstiel, Integrating Public and Private Enforcement in Europe: Legal and Jurisdictional Issues – The German Perspective
III Luís Silva Morais, Integrating Public and Private Enforcement in Europe: Legal Issues
IV Assimakis P Komninos, The Relationship between Public and Private Enforcement: quod Dei Deo, quod Caesaris Caesari
V Barry E Hawk and Yolaine Seaton, US Antitrust Arbitration
Part III Options for Collective Redress in the European Union
I J Thomas Rosch, Designing a Private Remedies System for Antitrust Cases – Lessons Learned from the U.S. Experience
II James Keyte, Collective Redress: Perspectives from the US Experience
III Brian A Facey and David Rosner, Collective Redress for Cartel Damages in Canada
IV Mario Siragusa, Options for Collective Redress in the EU
V Silvia Pietrini, The Future of Collective Damages Actions in Europe
Part IV Drawing Lessons and Conclusions
I John Ratliff, Integrating Public and Private Enforcement of Competition Law: Implications for Courts and Agencies
II Ian S Forrester and Mark D Powell, Market Forces and Private Enforcement: A Start But Some Way Still to Go
III Bruno Lasserre, Integrating Public and Private Enforcement of Competition Law: Implications for Courts and Agencies
IV Horst Butz, Integrating Public and Private Enforcement in Europe: Issues for Courts
V Philip Lowe, Conclusions
Part V Private Damages Claims and the Elusive Futur
I Veljko Milutinoviæ, The 'Right to Damages' in a 'System of Parallel Competences': A Fresh Look at BRT v SABAM