Criminal Evidence

Jefferson L. Ingram is Professor in the Department of Political Science at the University of Dayton. He has a B.S. in secondary education, a M.A. in history, and a Juris Doctor. He is a member of the Ohio Bar, Florida Bar, Bar of the federal courts for the Southern District of Ohio, and a member of the Bar of the Supreme Court of the United States.

History and Approach to Study 1. History and Development of Rules of Evidence 2. Approach to the Study of Criminal Evidence Proof by Evidence and Substitutes 3. Burden of Proof 4. Proof via Evidence 5. Judicial Notice 6. Presumptions, Inferences, and Stipulations General Admissibility Tests 7. Relevancy and Materiality 8. Competency of Evidence and Witnesses Evidence Via Witness Testimony 9. Examination of Witnesses 10. Privileges 11. Opinions and Expert Testimony 12. Hearsay Rule and Exceptions Evidence Via Documents and Real Evidence 13. Documentary Evidence 14. Real Evidence 15. Results of Examinations and Tests Exclusion of Evidence on Constitutional Grounds 16. Evidence Unconstitutionally Obtained Part II: Judicial Decision Relating to Part I Glossary Appendix I: Federal Rules of Evidence for United States Courts and Magistrates Appendix II: Table of Jurisdictions in which Uniform Rules of Evidence have been Adopted—2009 Appendix III: Table of Contents Uniform Rules of Evidence with 2005 Amendments Table of Cases