TERRESTRIAL IMPACT STRUCTURES

Manfred Gottwald was educated in astronomy and physics at the Ludwig-Maxi­milians-Universität in Munich. After his Ph.D. in 1983 he worked in high-energy astrophysics for the European Space Agency and the Max-Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics, studying objects far out in our galaxy and beyond. When he joined the German Aerospace Center at Oberpfaffenhofen, our solar system and Earth became the scientific topics of choice. At the Earth Observation Center he was involved in many space-borne missions investigating our atmosphere, our cryosphere and the terrestrial surface. Particularly challenging was his responsibility for the atmospheric science instrument SCIAMACHY on the European ENVISAT platform. Since the International Polar Year 2007/2008 he coordinated the national Earth Observation missions in support of polar science under the auspices of the World Meteorological Organization. This familiarized him with the TanDEM-X radar mission, whose high-resolution digital elevation model allowed Manfred to engage in impact craters, a field where astronomy meets geology.

Thomas Kenkmann studied geology and paleontology at the University of Cologne and completed his dissertation in 1997 at the Freie Universität Berlin. Since 2010 he has been Professor of Geology and Structural Geology at the University of Freiburg, Germany. Thomas Kenkmann and his working group are investigating the structure and deformation inventory of impact craters on Earth and other planetary bodies at scales ranging from satellite imagery to micrometers. Thomas is a passionate field geologist, who has studied more than 40 terrestrial impact craters worldwide, and mapped many of them geologically, among them Upheaval Dome in the United States, Jebel Waqf as Suwwan in Jordan, Serra da Cangalha in Brazil, and Matt Wilson, and Gosses Bluff in Australia. He is responsible for a number of crater discoveries and confirmations such as Saqqar in Saudi Arabia, the Douglas crater strewn field in the United States, or Ramgarh in India. In 2018 he received the Barringer Medal and Award of the Meteoritical Society for his key contributions to the area of impact crater research.

Wolf Uwe Reimold holds M.Sc. (1977) and Ph.D. (1980) degrees in Mineralogy from the University of Münster (Germany). Post-doctoral research at NASA Johnson Space Center in Houston (USA) was followed by research positions and then a Professorship in Mineralogy at the University of the Witwatersrand (Johannesburg, South Africa, 1984­2005). Uwe’s main research interests have been multidisciplinary Impact Crater and Shock Metamorphism studies, besides some Economic Geology and Regional Geology exploits in southern Africa and Ethiopia. Impact research was mainly focused on structures in Africa, Europe, and North America, including a major contribution to the understanding of the Vredefort impact structure in South Africa. Other main research targets were Bosumtwi (Ghana), Roter Kamm (Namibia), and various structures in Scandinavia, and in recent years in Brazil. In 2006, Uwe transferred to Humboldt University and the Museum für Naturkunde in Berlin, where he served as Professor of Mineralogy and Petrography, and Head of the Evolution and Geosciences Division of the Museum. In 2018 Uwe took retirement in Berlin, and a new position as Professor Titular at the Institute of Geosciences at the University of Brasília, Brasil.

Band 1

Preface 7
Acknowledgments 8
Small Bodies in the Solar System 9
The Beginning 9
Relics of Planetary Formation 10
Impacts 11
Hypervelocity Impacts 11
Impact Crater Formation 12
Contact and Compression 12
Excavation 13
Modification 14
Shock Metamorphic Effects 15
High-Pressure Polymorphs 16
Impactites 17
Tracing the Meteoritic Projectile in Impact Breccias
and Impact Melt Rock 17
Terrestrial Impact Structures 19
Earth’s Impact Crater Record 19
The Actual Impact Structure Record 19
Impact Structure Parameterization 20
Radar Remote Sensing 23
Synthetic Aperture Radar 23
SAR Interferometry 24
The TanDEM-X Mission 26
TanDEM-X Data Acquisition 27
TanDEM-X DEM Generation 27
TanDEM-X Maps of Impact Structures 30
Data Fusion TanDEM-X / Multispectral Sensor 32
The Atlas 33
7.1 Africa 35
Overview 36
Agoudal, Morocco 38
Amguid, Algeria 40
Aorounga, Chad 42
Aouelloul, Mauretania 45
Bosumtwi, Ghana 48
BP, Libya 52
Gweni Fada, Chad 56
Kalkkop, South Africa 58
Kamil, Egypt 60
Kgagodi Basin, Botswana 62
Libyan Desert Glass, Egypt 64
Luizi, Democratic Republic of Congo 67
Morokweng, South Africa 70
Oasis, Libya 72
Roter Kamm, Namibia 75
Talemzane, Algeria 78
Tenoumer, Mauretania 81
Tin Bider, Algeria 84
Tswaing, South Africa 86
Vredefort, South Africa 89
Impact Structures – Further Confirmation Required
Ouarkziz, Algeria 97
7.2 North/Central America 100
Overview 101
Ames, Oklahoma, United States 104
Avak, Alaska, United States 104
Beaverhead, Montana, United States 108
Brent, Ontario, Canada 110
Calvin, Michigan, United States 112
Carswell, Saskatchewan, Canada 114
Charlevoix, Quebec, Canada 116
Chesapeake Bay, Virginia, United States 119
Chicxulub, Mexico 122
Clearwater East and Clearwater West, Quebec, Canada 126
Cloud Creek, Wyoming, United States 130
Couture, Quebec, Canada 132
Crooked Creek, Missouri, United States 134
Decaturville, Missouri, United States 136
Decorah, Iowa, United States 138
Deep Bay, Saskatchewan, Canada 140
Des Plaines, Illinois, United States 142
Douglas Crater Field, Wyoming, United States 144
Eagle Butte, Alberta, Canada 148
Elbow, Saskatchewan, Canada 150
Flynn Creek, Tennessee, United States 152
Glasford, Illinois, United States 154
Glover Bluff, Wisconsin, United States 156
Gow, Saskatchewan, Canada 158
Haughton, Nunavut, Canada 160
Haviland, Kansas, United States 162
Holleford, Ontario, Canada 164
Île Rouleau, Quebec, Canada 166
Kentland, Indiana, United States 168
La Moinerie, Quebec, Canada 170
Manicouagan, Quebec, Canada 172
Manson, Iowa, United States 178
Maple Creek, Saskatchewan, Canada 180
Marquez, Texas, United States 182
Meteor Crater, Arizona, United States 184
Middlesboro, Kentucky, United States 188
Mistastin, Labrador, Canada 190
Montagnais, Nova Scotia, Canada 194
Newporte, North Dakota, United States 196
Nicholson Lake, Northwest Territories, Canada 198
Odessa Crater Field, Texas, United States 200
Pilot, Northwest Territories, Canada 202
Pingualuit, Quebec, Canada 204
Presqu’île, Quebec, Canada 206
Red Wing, North Dakota, United States 208
Rock Elm, Wisconsin, United States 210
Saint Martin, Manitoba, Canada 212
Santa Fe, New Mexico, United States 214
Serpent Mound, Ohio, United States 216
Sierra Madera, Texas, United States 218
Slate Islands, Ontario, Canada 221
Steen River, Alberta, Canada 224
Sudbury, Ontario, Canada 226
Tunnunik, Northwest Territories, Canada 230
Upheaval Dome, Utah, United States 232
Viewfield, Saskatchewan, Canada 236
Wanapitei, Ontario, Canada 238
Wells Creek, Tennessee, United States 240
West Hawk, Manitoba, Canada 242
Wetumpka, Alabama, United States 244
Whitecourt, Alberta, Canada 246
Impact Structures – Further Confirmation Required
Bloody Creek, Nova Scotia, Canada 248
Hiawatha, Greenland 250
Pantasma, Nicaragua 252
7.3 South America 257
Overview 258
Araguainha, Brazil 260
Campo del Cielo Crater Field, Argentina 264
Carancas, Peru 266
Cerro do Jarau, Brazil 269
Monturaqui, Chile 272
Riachão, Brazil 275
Santa Marta, Brazil 278
São Miguel do Tapuio, Brazil 282
Serra da Cangalha, Brazil 285
Vargeão Dome, Brazil 288
Vista Alegre, Brazil 292
Impact Structures – Further Confirmation Required
Colônia Basin, Brazil 296
Nova Colinas, Brazil 298
Rio Cuarto Crater Field, Argentina 301
Geologic Timescale 304
7.4 Asia 311 (part 2)
7.5 Australia 373 (part 2)
7.6 Europe 449 (part 2)

Band 2
7.1 Africa 35 (part 1)
7.2 North/Central America 100 (part 1)
7.3 South America 257 (part 1)
7.4 Asia 311
Overview 312
Beyenchime-Salaatin, Russia 314
Bigach, Kazakhstan 316
Chiyli, Kazakhstan 318
Chukcha, Russia 320
Dhala, India 322
El’gygytgyn, Russia 325
Jebel Waqf as Suwwan, Jordan 328
Logancha, Russia 332
Lonar, India 334
Macha Crater Field, Russia 336
Popigai, Russia 338
Ragozinka, Russia 340
Ramgarh, India 342
Saqqar, Saudi Arabia 346
Shunak, Kazakhstan 348
Sikhote Alin Crater Field, Russia 350
Sobolev, Russia 352
Tabun-Khara-Obo, Mongolia 354
Wabar Crater Field, Saudi Arabia356
Xiuyan, China 359
Zhamanshin, Kazakhstan 362
Impact Structures – Further Confirmation Required
Kara-Kul, Tajikistan 365
Yilan, China 368
Strongest Airburst in Modern Times
Tunguska, Russia 370
7.5 Australia 373
Overview 374
Acraman, South Australia 376
Amelia Creek, Northern Territory 378
Boxhole, Northern Territory 380
Cleanskin, Northern Territory 382
Dalgaranga, Western Australia 384
Foelsche, Northern Territory 386
Glikson, Western Australia 388
Goat Paddock, Western Australia 391
Gosses Bluff, Northern Territory 394
Goyder, Northern Territory 398
Henbury Crater Field, Northern Territory 400
Hickman, Western Australia 403
Kelly West, Northern Territory 406
Lake Raeside, Western Australia 408
Lawn Hill, Queensland 410
Liverpool, Northern Territory 412
Matt Wilson, Northern Territory 414
Shoemaker, Western Australia 417
Spider, Western Australia 420
Strangways, Northern Territory 423
Tookoonooka, Queensland 426
Veevers, Western Australia 428
Wolfe Creek, Western Australia 430
Woodleigh, Western Australia 434
Yallalie, Western Australia 436
Yarrabubba, Western Australia 438
Impact Structures – Further Confirmation Required
Connolly Basin, Western Australia 440
Crawford and Flaxman, South Australia 442
Mount Toondina, South Australia 444
Piccaninny, Western Australia 446
7.6 Europe 449
Overview 451
Boltysh, Ukraine 454
Dellen, Sweden 456
Dobele, Latvia 458
Gardnos, Norway 460
Granby, Sweden 462
Gusev and Kamensk, Russia 464
Hummeln, Sweden 466
Ilumetsä Crater Field, Estonia 468
Ilyinets, Ukraine 470
Iso-Naakkima, Finland 472
Jänisjärvi, Russia 474
Kaalijärv Crater Field, Estonia 476
Kärdla, Estonia 478
Kaluga, Russia 480
Kamenetsk, Ukraine 482
Kara, Russia 484
Karikkoselkä, Finland 488
Karla, Russia 490
Keurusselkä, Finland 492
Kursk, Russia 494
Lappajärvi, Finland 496
Lockne, Sweden 499
Logoisk, Belarus 502
Lumparn, Finland 504
Målingen, Sweden 506
Mien, Sweden 508
Mishina Gora, Russia 510
Mizarai, Lithuania 512
Mjølnir, Norway 514
Morasko Crater Field, Poland 516
Neugrund, Estonia 518
Obolon, Ukraine 520
Paasselkä, Finland 522
Puchezh-Katunki, Russia 524
Ries, Germany 526
Ritland, Norway 532
Rochechouart, France 536
Rotmistrovka, Ukraine 538
Saarijärvi, Finland 540
Sääksjärvi, Finland 542
Siljan, Sweden 544
Söderfjärden, Finland 548
Steinheim Basin, Germany 550
Sterlitamak, Russia 554
Suavjärvi, Russia 556
Summanen, Finland 558
Suvasvesi North and Suvasvesi South, Finland 560
Ternovka, Ukraine 562
Tvären, Sweden 564
Vepriai, Lithuania 566
Zapadnaja, Ukraine 568
Zeleny Gai, Ukraine 570
Geologic Timescale 573
Selected References 575
Glossary 593
Chemical Elements 599
Abbreviations and Acronyms 599
Impact Geology Index 601
Cartographic Index 604
Authors 607

The idea for this atlas was born already several years ago. Then, a precise topographic atlas presenting terrestrial impact craters, the scars of the impacts of solid bodies onto the Earth’s surface, had not been established yet. This was astonishing, as such impacts had long been considered as the “most fundamental process on the surfaces of the terrestrial planets”, as the late Eugene Shoemaker, one of the pioneers of impact geology, had put it. But when the first digital elevation data had been processed from the early phase of the TanDEM-X mission, they immediately showed their great potential for mapping applications. We were particularly excited, because the objective of this space-borne undertaking of generating a precise high-resolution digital elevation model for the entire solid surface of Earth would allow, for the first time, to map the morphology of all terrestrial impact structures with a topographic expression, in detail. What had been the limiting factor of the existing datasets for such an exercise in the past – no global coverage, data gaps, or data artefacts – would no longer hamper the cartographic work. Only very small impact craters below the resolution of the TanDEM-X data would escape recognition in the TanDEM-X maps. Patience, however, was required before the final TanDEM-X Digital Elevation Model (DEM) was released and access to the data for science applications was granted. In the meantime, we had investigated the workflow to present the topography of an impact structure and its environs by using Raw DEM scenes. Because our intention was not to merely publish a sequence of high-quality maps, our atlas concept foresaw to additionally provide short and concise, illustrated text sections for each impact structure. As two of us, Thomas Kenkmann and Wolf Uwe Reimold, have throughout their careers as impact geologists confirmed the impact origin of a considerable number of structures and participated in the studies of many more, these so-called “fact sheets” also reflect personal experience. Clearly this is the reason why these texts sometimes differ in style – this is indeed intended. What is more, the fact sheets also reflect the varied degrees of detailed study that different impact structures have permitted to date. The individual texts also provide information about the location of a structure and how to access it. For those structures in very remote parts of the globe, the access notes can, however, be limited. A list of selected references completes each text. These are the main references that were used by the authors of the individual fact sheets – who are acknowledged at the top of each structure’s first page. These references are also intended to provide the layperson with a strategic entry into the literature pertaining to any of these impact structures. The atlas consists of three parts: introductory chapters, the physical maps with corresponding texts for all impact structures covered herein, and an annexure with supplementary information. The first introductory chapter briefly explains why interplanetary space is filled with small bodies and why they sometimes approach Earth’s orbit. Chapter 2 goes a bit deeper into the principles of hypervelocity impact. It explains crater formation, shock metamorphism, and specific impact-related lithologies. This chapter introduces impact related concepts that are addressed in more detail in the subsequent impact structure-related fact sheets. The third chapter describes the terrestrial impact crater record. A short account on its completeness – or rather lack thereof – is followed by its status at the time of the manuscript deadline as of February 2020. As the last two years have been very productive in identifying previously unknown impact structures, we have thrived towards a status that is as complete as possible. Our atlas, however, has a differentiated view on some alleged impact structures. Where we feel that the evidence for an impact origin is still incomplete or ambiguous, we treat these structures separately, even though other impact data bases may list these cases as confirmed – without further analysis of the evidence. The remaining introductory chapters explain the remote sensing principles behind data acquisition and processing, together with how the physical maps were generated. Chapter 4 illustrates radar remote sensing, particularly the concept of Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) that allows high-resolution space-borne imaging in the microwave spectral domain. While SAR yields 2D imagery, it is a pre-condition for SAR interferometry, which exploits elevation and therefore delivers a 3D view. This concept has been successfully implemented in the TanDEM-X mission, which is the topic of chapter 5. This section not only summarizes the characteristics of both radar satellites, but it also explains how the challenging task of interferometric data takes was pursued with subsequent data processing. Chapter 6 explains how the maps were produced. This demanded a stepwise approach with observation of various requirements, such as map projection, illumination, and dealing with the presence of water bodies. With chapter 7 the map-oriented part of the atlas – by far the major portion of our book – begins: Africa, North/Central America and South America are covered in Part 1, Asia, Australia and Europe in Part 2. All impact structures on a continent are listed alphabetically. Each section comprises a one-page physical map together with the illustrated fact sheet. Those structures where confirmation as impact structures has remained ambiguous or incomplete appear separately at the end of each continent chapter. An annex with the complete list of selected references, a glossary, a geologic timescale, and lists of acronyms and abbreviations completes the atlas. For whom, which readership, was this atlas compiled? Our atlas is intended to provide the professional expert with a reference book summarizing the terrestrial impact crater record as of February 2020 in a complete and coherent, as well as concise manner. For the interested layman our book can be a source of impact cratering information at different levels – basic in the introductory chapters and more specific in the fact sheets. The maps together with the indication how to access an individual impact site may even trigger visits to some of the more conveniently located structures. In this atlas our knowledge and expertise from different research areas – impact geology, a bit of astronomy, and remote sensing – has been combined. Thomas Kenkmann and Wolf Uwe Reimold assembled the fact sheets for the currently confirmed impact structures. Their ongoing work in the past years even helped to add several new impact structures to the terrestrial impact record – and to the atlas content. We believe that this work provides a status that is as up-to-date as possible. During their field work, they obtained a large repository of imagery, some of which is shared here in the book. Manfred Gott­wald dealt with the remote sensing related tasks, formulated the introductory chapters, and took care of the graphic artwork. This included the processing of the TanDEM-X digital elevation data, the production of the physical maps, and, where appropriate, the fusion of the TanDEM-X data with Sentinel-2 data. What we present in this atlas about the terrestrial impact structure record – its content and parameterization – reflects the status that, as we feel, provides a complete and consistent view as of February 2020. For several impacts, however, different results can be found in literature. As the study of impact structures is an ongoing and vivid research topic, for these structures only future work will reveal the final truth. Considerable effort has been put into the making of this reference work. We hope that our result will provide assistance to many, and enjoyment as well. It may be a reference volume for years to come. Manfred Gottwald, Garching bei München Thomas Kenkmann, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität, Freiburg Wolf Uwe Reimold, University of Brasília, Brasília February 2020

The idea for this atlas was born already several years ago. Then, a precise topographic atlas presenting terrestrial impact craters, the scars of the impacts of solid bodies onto the Earth's surface, had not been established yet. This was astonishing, as such impacts had long been considered as the "most fundamental process on the surfaces of the terrestrial planets", as the late Eugene Shoemaker, one of the pioneers of impact geology, had put it. But when the first digital elevation data had been processed from the early phase of the TanDEM-X mission, they immediately showed their great potential for mapping applications. We were particularly excited, because the objective of this space-borne undertaking of generating a precise high-resolution digital elevation model for the entire solid surface of Earth would allow, for the first time, to map the morphology of all terrestrial impact structures with a topographic expression, in detail. What had been the limiting factor of the existing datasets for such an exercise in the past - no global coverage, data gaps, or data artefacts - would no longer hamper the cartographic work. Only very small impact craters below the resolution of the TanDEM-X data would escape recognition in the TanDEM-X maps. Patience, however, was required before the final TanDEM-X Digital Elevation Model (DEM) was released and access to the data for science applications was granted. In the meantime, we had investigated the workflow to present the topography of an impact structure and its environs by using Raw DEM scenes. Because our intention was not to merely publish a sequence of high-quality maps, our atlas concept foresaw to additionally provide short and concise, illustrated text sections for each impact structure. As two of us, Thomas Kenkmann and Wolf Uwe Reimold, have throughout their careers as impact geologists confirmed the impact origin of a considerable number of structures and participated in the studies of many more, these so-called "fact sheets" also reflect personal experience. Clearly this is the reason why these texts sometimes differ in style - this is indeed intended. What is more, the fact sheets also reflect the varied degrees of detailed study that different impact structures have permitted to date. The individual texts also provide information about the location of a structure and how to access it. For those structures in very remote parts of the globe, the access notes can, however, be limited. A list of selected references completes each text. These are the main references that were used by the authors of the individual fact sheets - who are acknowledged at the top of each structure's first page. These references are also intended to provide the layperson with a strategic entry into the literature pertaining to any of these impact structures. The atlas consists of three parts: introductory chapters, the physical maps with corresponding texts for all impact structures covered herein, and an annexure with supplementary information. The first introductory chapter briefly explains why interplanetary space is filled with small bodies and why they sometimes approach Earth's orbit. Chapter 2 goes a bit deeper into the principles of hypervelocity impact. It explains crater formation, shock metamorphism, and specific impact-related lithologies. This chapter introduces impact related concepts that are addressed in more detail in the subsequent impact structure-related fact sheets. The third chapter describes the terrestrial impact crater record. A short account on its completeness - or rather lack thereof - is followed by its status at the time of the manuscript deadline as of February 2020. As the last two years have been very productive in identifying previously unknown impact structures, we have thrived towards a status that is as complete as possible. Our atlas, however, has a differentiated view on some alleged impact structures. Where we feel that the evidence for an impact origin is