Energy and Climate Policies in China and India

Fuzuo Wu is an Assistant Professor at Aalborg University, Denmark. She holds a Ph.D. in International Relations from Fudan University, and was a postdoctoral researcher at Princeton University, the University of Oxford, and Yale University; a Visiting Senior Research Fellow at Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy, National University of Singapore; a Research Fellow at Center for Chinese Foreign Policy Studies at Fudan University; and a Junior Research Fellow at the Institute of South Asian Studies at Sichuan University, China. She has published a book in Chinese and a few articles in peer-reviewed journals, such as the Journal of Contemporary China, Asian Survey, Asian Perspective, and the Journal of Chinese Political Science.

Part I. Introduction and Analytical Framework: 1. Introduction; 1.1. China and India's puzzling energy and climate policy behavior; 1.2. Argument in brief and propositions; 1.3. Literature review: levels of analysis; 1.4. Case selection; 1.5. Contributions of the book; 1.6. Structure of the book; 2. Shaping China and India's energy and climate policy behavior: wealth, status and asymmetrical interdependence; 2.1. China and India: proactive and reactive state actors; 2.2. Two-level pressures: wealth, status, and asymmetrical interdependence; 2.3. Conclusion; Part II. The Inside-Out: 3. China and India's domestic energy policy: proactive; 3.1. Energy security: a top priority for China and India; 3.2. China and India's proactive domestic measures to procure energy security; 3.3. Differences between China and India's domestic energy policy approaches; 3.4. Conclusion; 4. China and India's energy diplomacy: proactively preempting and reactively restraining; 4.1. China and India's energy diplomacy: proactive and reactive; 4.2. China and India's energy diplomacy toward Iran; 4.3. China and India's energy diplomacy toward Sudan; 4.4. China and India's energy diplomacy toward Myanmar; 4.5. Comparison of the three cases; 4.6. Shaping China and India's energy diplomacy: two-level pressures; 4.7. Conclusion; Part III. The Outside-In: 5. China and India negotiating climate change: proactively free-riding and reactively burden sharing; 5.1. China and India's dual-track climate diplomacy; 5.2. Compromises under duel-track climate diplomacy; 5.3. Shaping China and India's climate diplomacy: two-level pressures; 5.4. Conclusion; 6. China and India's domestic climate policy: reactive; 6.1. Pressures from epistemic communities to address climate change; 6.2. China and India's reactive domestic policy measures to address climate change; 6.3. China and India subordinating climate change to energy security; 6.4. Shaping Sino-Indian domestic energy and climate policy: two-level pressures; 6.5. Conclusion; Part IV. Implications and Conclusion: 7. Implications for global energy and climate governance; 7.1. Global energy and climate governance; 7.2. Implications of Sino-India addressing energy insecurity and climate change for global energy and climate governance; 7.3. Conclusion; 8. Conclusion; 8.1. Principal findings; 8.2. Implications for international relations research; 8.3. Understanding China and India's rise.