The Science of Conjecture

Before Pascal and Fermat's discovery of the mathematics of probability in 1654, how did we make reliable predictions? This text provides a history of rational methods of dealing with uncertainty, some avoiding numbers entirely, which were used before the principles of probability were learned.

---

Before Pascal and Fermat's discovery of the mathematics of probability in 1654, how did we make reliable predictions? What methods in law, science, commerce, philosophy, and logic helped us to get at the truth in cases where certainty was not attainable? In this text, James Franklin examines how judges, witch inquisitors, and juries evaluated evidence; scientists weighed reasons for and against scientific theories; and merchants counted shipwrecks to determine insurance rates. Sometimes this type of reasoning avoided numbers entirely, as in the legal standard of "proof beyond a reasonable doubt"; at other times it involved rough numerical estimates, as in gambling odds or the level of risk in chance events. The book provides a history of rational methods of dealing with uncertainty. Everyone can take a rough account of risk, Franklin argues, but understanding the principles of probability and using them to improve performance is an immense task - a task that had to be learned over human history, just as we had to train ourselves to become aware of the principles of perspective. The theme of this study is the "coming to consciousness" of human understanding of risk.