Guest editors Nabil M. Elkassabany and Edward R. Mariano have assembled an expert team of authors on the topic of Orthopedic Anesthesia. Articles include: Evidence-Based Medicine for Ultrasound-Guided Regional Anesthesia,Role of Regional Anesthesia in Orthopedic Trauma, Which Outcomes Related to Regional Anesthesia Are Most Important for Orthopedic Surgery Patients?,Optimizing Perioperative Care for Patients with Hip Fracture, Regional Anesthesia-Analgesia: Relationship to Cancer Recurrence and Infection, Developing a Multidisciplinary Fall Reduction Program for Lower-Extremity Joint Arthroplasty Patients, Optimizing Perioperative Management of Total Joint Arthroplasty, and more!
Front Cover 1
OrthopedicAnesthesiology 2
Copyright 3
Contributors 4
Contents 8
Anesthesiology Clinics 11
Foreword 12
Preface 14
Evidence-Based Medicine for Ultrasound-Guided Regional Anesthesia 16
Key points 16
Introduction 16
Review of more recent evidence directly comparing ultrasound guidance to peripheral nerve stimulation for peripheral nerve ... 18
Review of more recent evidence for ultrasound guidance in central neuraxial anesthesia 19
Ultrasound-Assisted Technique 19
Real-Time Ultrasound-Guided Technique 19
Review of recent evidence for ultrasound guidance and patient safety 23
Evidence for ultrasound guidance and continuous peripheral nerve blocks 24
Evidence for optimal ultrasound-guided local anesthetic distribution 25
Summary 27
References 27
Role of Regional Anesthesia in Orthopedic Trauma 34
Key points 34
Introduction 34
Trauma and the Role of the Anesthesiologist 34
History of Pain Relief for Patients with Orthopedic Trauma and the Role of Regional Anesthesia in the Battlefield 35
Neurochemistry of Nociception in Trauma 36
Benefits of Regional Anesthesia and Analgesia in Orthopedic Trauma 37
Advantages of Regional Anesthesia in Orthopedic Trauma 37
Improved Outcomes in Patients Receiving Neuraxial Anesthesia Compared with General Anesthesia 38
Perioperative regional techniques in orthopedic trauma 38
Neuraxial Techniques 38
Paravertebral Block 38
Peripheral Nerve Blocks 39
Upper extremity nerve blocks 39
Lower extremity nerve blocks 40
Single-injection blocks versus continuous catheter techniques 40
Regional Analgesia for Crush Injuries 42
Local anesthetics and analgesic adjuvants for regional anesthesia 42
Neuraxial Blocks 42
Peripheral Nerve Blocks 43
The Risks of Regional Anesthesia in Orthopedic Trauma 43
Compartment syndrome 43
Infection 45
Peripheral nerve injury 46
Regional anesthesia in heavily sedated patients 47
Hemostasis in Trauma 49
Future considerations and summary 49
References 49
Which Outcomes Related to Regional Anesthesia Are Most Important for Orthopedic Surgery Patients? 54
Key points 54
Introduction 55
Pain management 55
Morbidity, mortality, and complications 56
Resource use: transfusion, critical care admission, ventilation 57
Patient comfort and satisfaction 58
Economic advantages 59
Length-of-stay earlier discharge 60
Improved functional outcome and inpatient fall risk 60
Summary 62
References 62
Optimizing Perioperative Care for Patients with Hip Fracture 68
Key points 68
The challenges 68
Preoperative risk consideration and optimization 69
Cardiac Consideration in Patients with Hip Fracture and Risk Stratification 69
Pulmonary Consideration in Patients with Hip Fracture and Risk Stratification 71
Risk of Venous Thromboembolism 74
Delirium 74
Other Preoperative Medical Considerations 74
Recommendation 76
Intraoperative considerations 76
Surgical Considerations 76
The Choice of Anesthesia 78
Postoperative care 79
Institutional guidelines 79
References 79
Regional Anesthesia-Analgesia 86
Key points 86
Introduction 86
The immune system and cancer 87
Surgical stress leads to immunosuppression via stress response 87
Opioids and the immune system 88
Regional anesthesia and local anesthetic effects on immunosuppression 88
Studies investigating the relationship between regional anesthesia and cancer recurrence 89
Regional Anesthesia Does Improve Cancer Recurrence 90
Regional Anesthesia Does Not Improve Cancer Recurrence 90
Regional Anesthesia May or May Not Improve Cancer Recurrence 92
Meta-analyses 92
Surgical site infections and regional anesthesia 92
Summary 93
References 93
Developing a Multidisciplinary Fall Reduction Program for Lower-Extremity Joint Arthroplasty Patients 98
Key points 98
Introduction 99
Current guidelines 99
Multidisciplinary approach 100
Assessment 101
Risk factors for total joint arthroplasty patients 101
Strategies and interventions 102
Implementation 103
Sustainability 103
An example of selecting interventions for a fall reduction program 103
Education 104
Fall Risk Assessment Tools 105
Alert System 105
Bed-Exit Alarm 106
Preliminary Results 106
Summary 106
References 107
Optimizing Perioperative Management of Total Joint Arthroplasty 110
Key points 110
Introduction 110
Trends in Primary and Revision Total Knee and Total Hip Arthroplasty 111
Deconstructing Clinical Pathways 112
Multimodal analgesia and peripheral nerve blockade or local infiltration analgesia 113
Preventing the transition from acute to chronic pain 115
Limiting blood transfusions with tranexamic acid 115
Treating anemia in the preoperative period 115
Tranexamic acid 116
Early and accelerated rehabilitation 116
Current Controversies in Preoperative Optimization 116
Malnutrition and morbid obesity 117
Tobacco abuse 118
Glycemic control 118
Patient education 118
Future considerations/summary 119
References 119
Preoperative Evaluation and Preparation of Patients for Orthopedic Surgery 126
Key points 126
Introduction 126
Risk stratification 127
Patients with hip (femur) fractures 128
Preoperative testing 129
Medical conditions that frequently require patients to undergo orthopedic procedures 129
Ankylosing Spondylitis 129
Scoliosis 130
Rheumatoid Arthritis 130
Hemophilia 131
Perioperative medication management 132
Blood conservation strategies 133
Patient education 133
Future considerations and summary 134
References 134
Setting Up an Acute Pain Management Service 138
Key points 138
Introduction 138
Multimodal approach to pain management 139
Structure and individual roles within an acute pain management service 139
Role of acute pain management service nurses and the use of protocols 141
Intravenous patient-controlled analgesia 141
Opioid-tolerant patients 143
Chronic Opioid Users 143
Patients with Opioid Abuse or Addiction 144
Neuraxial analgesia 145
Continuous peripheral nerve blocks 148
Potential Complications of Upper and Lower Extremity Nerve Blocks 148
Monitoring for Falls in Patients with Lower Extremity Blockade 151
The Role of Local Anesthetic Additives in Perineural Analgesia 152
The Role of the Acute Pain Management Service in an Ambulatory Continuous Perineural Catheter Service 152
Summary 152
References 153
Setting Up an Ambulatory Regional Anesthesia Program for Orthopedic Surgery 156
Key points 156
Introduction 156
Potential advantages of regional anesthesia 156
Regional Anesthesia Optimizes Analgesia 156
Regional Anesthesia Decreases Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting 157
Regional Anesthesia Can Prevent Unanticipated Admissions and Lead to Earlier Discharge 157
Regional Anesthesia Can Increase Efficiency 157
Regional Anesthesia Can Improve Patient Satisfaction 158
Surgeons May Prefer Regional Anesthesia 158
Practical details for organizing an ambulatory regional anesthesia service 158
Patient Education and Screening 158
Resources Including Equipment and Personnel 159
Techniques for Block Placement 159
Ambulatory Orthopedic Procedures Amenable to Perineural Blockade 160
Models of Practice 160
Multimodal Approach and Clinical Pathways 161
Postoperative Considerations 161
Postoperative considerations for ambulatory perineural catheters 163
Future considerations 163
References 164
Perioperative Management of the Opioid Tolerant Patient for Orthopedic Surgery 168
Key points 168
Introduction 168
Supraspinal mechanisms of opioids 170
Cellular mechanisms of tolerance 170
Background on clinical studies 171
Protocols for patient care in the postoperative period 172
Summary 174
References 174
Suggested reading 177
Index 178
Evidence-Based Medicine for Ultrasound-Guided Regional Anesthesia
Francis V. Salinas, MD∗Francis.salinas@vmmc.org and Neil A. Hanson, MD, Department of Anesthesiology, Virginia Mason Medical Center, 1100 9th Avenue, Mailstop B2-AN, Seattle, WA 98101, USA
∗Corresponding author.
Available evidence favoring the use of ultrasound for regional anesthesia is reviewed, updated, and critically assessed. Important outcome advantages include decreased time to block onset; decreased risk of local anesthetic systemic toxicity; and, depending on the outcome definition, increased block success rates. Ultrasound guidance, peripheral nerve blocks, and central neuraxial blocks are discussed.
Keywords
Ultrasound guidance
Peripheral nerve blocks
Central neuraxial blocks
Complications
Peripheral nerve injury
Local anesthetic systemic toxicity
Key points
• Ultrasound guidance (USG) has had a profound effect on regional anesthesiology and acute pain medicine.
• Despite the heterogeneity in the design of multiple randomized controlled trials, USG has consistently provided improved outcomes regarding block procedure time, block onset time, and (depending on the varying definitions) increased block success for single-injection and continuous peripheral nerve blocks.
• More recent data support a role for preprocedural USG in patients with predictors of technically difficult spinal anesthesia.
• Although the evidence for decreasing the risk of peripheral injury is currently lacking, accumulating evidence confirms that USG decreases but (just as important) does not eliminate the risk of local anesthetic systemic toxicity.
• The focus of research has appropriately changed to investigating the optimal USG techniques for specific nerve blocks and emerging data should further expand the applications and benefits of regional anesthesia.
Introduction
Ultrasound guidance (USG) has gained widespread acceptance in anesthesiology and perioperative medicine.1,2 Evidence strongly supports increased safety, effectiveness, and efficiency of vascular access with USG compared with anatomic landmark-based techniques.3 Regional anesthesia, especially for peripheral nerve blocks (PNBs), has increased in popularity during the last decade primarily due to the widespread adoption of USG as the dominant technique for nerve localization. In 2010, The American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine published an executive summary and accompanying series of articles, providing evidenced-based recommendations on the use of USG for regional anesthesia.4–9 This series of articles critically appraised outcomes (Box 1) comparing USG to traditional landmark-based techniques (predominantly peripheral nerve stimulation [PNS]) as a nerve localization tool. Central to this series was the inclusion of only randomized controlled trials (RCTs), systematic reviews, meta-analyses, comparative studies, and large case series investigating the specific primary outcomes (see Box 1). Overall, these articles demonstrated that, for PNBs, USG provided a more rapid onset of sensory and/or motor block, increased block success, improved block quality (sensory and/or motor), decreased block performance time, and decreased local anesthetic dose requirements.4–9 Almost all studies did not specifically investigate or were not powered for success of surgical anesthesia as the primary outcome. At that time, there was insufficient evidence demonstrating a decrease in the incidence of clinically relevant patient-safety outcomes of peripheral nerve injury (PNI), local anesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST), or pneumothorax. Notably, there was a lack of published data directly comparing USG to traditional landmark-based techniques for central neuraxial anesthesia. Two subsequent meta-analyses specifically investigated the primary outcome measure of anesthesia sufficient for surgery without supplementation (additional nerve blocks or exceeding a predetermined amount of intravenous systemic analgesia) or conversion to general anesthesia. The pooled data from these 2 meta-analyses showed that USG was associated with an increased success rate of surgical block.10,11 However, caution is warranted when interpreting the results from these pooled data because surgical anesthesia was not the primary outcome in almost all of the individual RCTs in these meta-analyses.
Box 1 Outcome variables examined in ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia
• Block performance time (imaging and needle-guidance times)
• Successful placement and success of quality of CPNBs
• Number of needle passes and redirections
• Patient comfort during block placement
• Block onset
• Anesthesia-related time (performance and onset times)
• Local anesthetic requirements
• Block success (predefined quality of block within a specified timeframe)
Density of sensory block
Density of motor block
Surgical anesthesia without need for conversion to general (spinal) anesthesia or supplemental (systemic analgesics or additional nerve blocks)
• Complications
Vascular puncture (injury)
Peripheral nerve injury
Pneumothorax
Hemidiaphragmatic paresis
Local anesthetic systemic toxicity
• Cost-effectiveness
After this series of articles, there has been a paucity of RCTs directly comparing USG to PNS for PNBs. There are several reasons: (1) USG has rarely been found to be inferior to PNS, so perhaps there is less interest in adding additional data regarding the benefits of USG compared with PNS; (2) with the rapid improvement (increased image quality and portability) and decreased cost of ultrasound (US) technology, the cost-benefit argument against USG continues to decrease in terms of economic relevance; (3) the widespread adoption of USG as the dominant technique of peripheral nerve localization12,13; and (4) a shift in the emphasis on future research defining the optimal techniques for USG regional anesthesia.14,15 The latter is reflected in the number of lectures and workshops dedicated specifically to USG (and few, if any, on PNS) at national and international meetings with a focus on regional anesthesia, as well as the shift in priority to education and training in USG regional anesthesia.16,17 This article attempts to summarize and critically assess any additional data in the last 5 years directly comparing USG to PNS, including outcomes data for the use of USG for continuous PNBs (CPNBs). More specifically, due to the rare incidence of serious complications (PNS, LAST, and pneumothorax) and the lack of power of individual RCTs to demonstrate a statistically significant difference,9 the authors provide a critical assessment of recently published large databases and registries providing, when available, the most recent point estimates of the risk of these rare complications. The authors also critically assess more recent data regarding the optimal techniques for USG PNBs, and more recent data from RCTs regarding the potential outcome benefits of USG for spinal anesthesia.
Review of more recent evidence directly comparing ultrasound guidance to peripheral nerve stimulation for peripheral nerve blocks
Two recent RCTS examined block performance times directly comparing USG to PNS in anesthesia trainees.18,19 In a study of 41 subjects undergoing preoperative interscalene block before arthroscopic shoulder surgery, USG resulted in a statistically significant decrease in block performance time of 57% (4.3 ± 1.5 vs 10 ± 1.5 minutes) and sensory block onset time of 37% (12 ± 2 vs 19 ± 2 minutes).18 There was no difference in block success for surgical anesthesia, which was similarly high in both groups (95% vs 91%), most likely due to the large mass of local anesthetic (300 mg mepivacaine and 150 mg ropivacaine in 40 mL volume) used in this protocol. In a study of 71 subjects undergoing hallux valgus repair using popliteal sciatic nerve block (PSNB), USG (with targeted circumferential injection around the tibial nerve [TN] and common peroneal nerve [CPN]) did not provide any increase in onset time or surgical block success (94% in both groups) within 30 minutes compared with PNS (eliciting both TN and CPN evoked motor responses [EMRs]).19 USG decreased block performance time by 20% (82 seconds), although this was a secondary...
Erscheint lt. Verlag | 8.2.2015 |
---|---|
Sprache | englisch |
Themenwelt | Medizin / Pharmazie ► Gesundheitsfachberufe |
Medizin / Pharmazie ► Medizinische Fachgebiete ► Anästhesie | |
Medizinische Fachgebiete ► Chirurgie ► Unfallchirurgie / Orthopädie | |
ISBN-10 | 0-323-32639-0 / 0323326390 |
ISBN-13 | 978-0-323-32639-1 / 9780323326391 |
Haben Sie eine Frage zum Produkt? |
Größe: 4,2 MB
Kopierschutz: Adobe-DRM
Adobe-DRM ist ein Kopierschutz, der das eBook vor Mißbrauch schützen soll. Dabei wird das eBook bereits beim Download auf Ihre persönliche Adobe-ID autorisiert. Lesen können Sie das eBook dann nur auf den Geräten, welche ebenfalls auf Ihre Adobe-ID registriert sind.
Details zum Adobe-DRM
Dateiformat: PDF (Portable Document Format)
Mit einem festen Seitenlayout eignet sich die PDF besonders für Fachbücher mit Spalten, Tabellen und Abbildungen. Eine PDF kann auf fast allen Geräten angezeigt werden, ist aber für kleine Displays (Smartphone, eReader) nur eingeschränkt geeignet.
Systemvoraussetzungen:
PC/Mac: Mit einem PC oder Mac können Sie dieses eBook lesen. Sie benötigen eine
eReader: Dieses eBook kann mit (fast) allen eBook-Readern gelesen werden. Mit dem amazon-Kindle ist es aber nicht kompatibel.
Smartphone/Tablet: Egal ob Apple oder Android, dieses eBook können Sie lesen. Sie benötigen eine
Geräteliste und zusätzliche Hinweise
Buying eBooks from abroad
For tax law reasons we can sell eBooks just within Germany and Switzerland. Regrettably we cannot fulfill eBook-orders from other countries.
Kopierschutz: Adobe-DRM
Adobe-DRM ist ein Kopierschutz, der das eBook vor Mißbrauch schützen soll. Dabei wird das eBook bereits beim Download auf Ihre persönliche Adobe-ID autorisiert. Lesen können Sie das eBook dann nur auf den Geräten, welche ebenfalls auf Ihre Adobe-ID registriert sind.
Details zum Adobe-DRM
Dateiformat: EPUB (Electronic Publication)
EPUB ist ein offener Standard für eBooks und eignet sich besonders zur Darstellung von Belletristik und Sachbüchern. Der Fließtext wird dynamisch an die Display- und Schriftgröße angepasst. Auch für mobile Lesegeräte ist EPUB daher gut geeignet.
Systemvoraussetzungen:
PC/Mac: Mit einem PC oder Mac können Sie dieses eBook lesen. Sie benötigen eine
eReader: Dieses eBook kann mit (fast) allen eBook-Readern gelesen werden. Mit dem amazon-Kindle ist es aber nicht kompatibel.
Smartphone/Tablet: Egal ob Apple oder Android, dieses eBook können Sie lesen. Sie benötigen eine
Geräteliste und zusätzliche Hinweise
Buying eBooks from abroad
For tax law reasons we can sell eBooks just within Germany and Switzerland. Regrettably we cannot fulfill eBook-orders from other countries.
aus dem Bereich