Video Games and Creativity

Linda A. Jackson1; Alexander I. Games2    1 Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
2 Microsoft Corporation, Inc., Redmond, WA, USA

Outline

What Is Creativity?

Before any discussion of the effects of video game playing on creativity it is important to define what we mean by creativity. From a historical perspective, Wallis (1926) is credited with the first formal theory of creativity. In Wallas’s stage model, creative insights and illuminations are explained by a process consisting of five stages: (1) preparation—preparatory work on a problem that focuses the individual’s mind on the problem and explores the problem's dimensions; (2) incubation—where the problem is internalized into the unconscious mind and nothing appears externally to be happening; (3) intimation—the creative person gets a “feeling” that a solution is on its way; (4) illumination or insight—where the creative idea bursts forth from its preconscious processing into conscious awareness; and (5) verification—where the idea is consciously verified, elaborated, and then applied. Wallas considered creativity to be a legacy of the evolutionary process which allowed humans to quickly adapt to rapidly changing environments. Simonton (1999) provides an updated perspective on this view in his book, Origins of genius: Darwinian perspectives on creativity.

In 1927, Alfred North Whitehead wrote the first scholarly book on creativity, Process and reality, reprinted in 1978. He is credited with having coined the term “creativity,” still the preferred currency of exchange in literature, science, and the arts. In a later article titled “Creativity syndrome: Integration, application, and innovation,” Mumford and Gustafon (1988) argued that, in many ways, the ultimate concern in studies of creativity is the production of novel, socially valued products. They suggested that an integration and reorganization of cognitive structures is likely to underlie major creative contributions and that the application of existing cognitive structures is likely to underlie minor contributions. Extending this interpretation to the processes traditionally held to underlie individual differences in creativity, they noted that both major and minor forms of creativity require a number of different knowledges, skills, and abilities. Furthermore, effective translation of ideas into action will depend on a variety of individual (Person) and situational (Environmental) factors.

Two important issues raised in Mumford and Gustafon’s (1988) article concern the roles of intelligence and divergent thinking in creativity. They concluded, as have many researchers since then, that intelligence is important to creativity “up to a point,” beyond which greater intelligence does not lead to greater creativity (Habibollah, Rohani, Aizan, Sharir, & Kumar, 2010; O’Hara & Sternberg, 1999; Silvia, 2008). Divergent thinking, on the other hand, is critical to creativity. It was Guilford (1950, 1967a) who first drew the distinction between convergent and divergent thinking. Convergent thinking is the ability to apply rules to arrive at a single “correct” solution to a problem, such as the answer to an achievement test question. This process is systematic and linear. Divergent thinking, on the other hand, involves the creative generation of multiple answers to a set of problems. It occurs in a spontaneous, free-flowing, “nonlinear” manner. It is sometimes used as a synonym for creativity in the psychological literature but, as Mumford and Gustafon (1988) and other researchers later pointed out, there is far more to creativity than divergent thinking (Csikszentmihalyi, 1999; Kozbelt, Beghetto, & Runco, 2010; Meusburger, Funke, & Wunder, 2009; Mumford, 2003; Runco & Albert, 2010; Sternberg, Kaufman, & Pretz, 2002).

In a later summary of the scientific research, Mumford suggested that “Over the course of the last decade we seem to have reached a general agreement that creativity involves the production of novel, useful products.” Creativity can also be defined “as the process of producing something that is both original and worthwhile characterized by expressiveness and imagination” (Mumford, 2003, p. 110; see also Csikszentmihalyi, 1999, 2009; Lubart & Mouchiroud, 2003; Meusburger et al.,...