Redeeming Mathematics (eBook)

1

God and Mathematics

Let us begin with numbers. We can consider a particular case: 2 + 2 = 4. That is true. It was true yesterday. And it always will be true. It is true everywhere in the universe. We do not have to travel out to distant galaxies to check it. Why not? We just know. Why do we have this conviction? Is it not strange? What is it about 2 + 2 = 4 that results in this conviction about its universal truth?1

All Times and All Places

2 + 2 = 4 is true at all times and at all places.2 We have classic terms to describe this situation: the truth is omnipresent (present at all places) and eternal (there at all times). The truth 2 + 2 = 4 has these two characteristics or attributes that are classically attributed to God. So is God in our picture, already at this point? We will see.

Technically, God’s eternity is usually conceived of as being “above” or “beyond” time. But words like “above” and “beyond” are metaphorical and point to mysteries. There is, in fact, an analogous mystery with respect to 2 + 2 = 4. If 2 + 2 = 4 is universally true, is it not in some sense “beyond” the particularities of any one place or time?

Moreover, the Bible indicates that God is not only “above” time in the sense of not being subject to the limitations of finite creaturely experience of time, but is “in” time in the sense of acting in time and interacting with his creatures.3 Similarly, 2 + 2 = 4 is “above” time in its universality, but “in” time through its applicability to each particular situation. Two apples plus two more apples is four apples.

Divine Attributes of Arithmetical Truth

The attributes of omnipresence and eternity are only the beginning. On close examination, other divine attributes seem to belong to arithmetical truths.

Consider. If 2 + 2 = 4 holds for all times, we are presupposing that it is the same truth through all times. The truth does not change with time. It is immutable.

Next, 2 + 2 = 4 is at bottom ideational in character. We do not literally see the truth 2 + 2 = 4, but only particular instances to which it applies: two apples plus two apples. The truth that 2 + 2 = 4 is essentially immaterial and invisible, but is known through manifestations. Likewise, God is essentially immaterial and invisible, but is known through his acts in the world.

Next, we have already observed that 2 + 2 = 4 is true. Truthfulness is also an attribute of God.

The Power of Arithmetical Truth

Next, consider the attribute of power. Mathematicians make their formulations to describe properties of numbers. The properties are there before the mathematicians make their formulations. The human mathematical formulation follows the facts and is dependent on them. An arithmetical truth or regularity must hold for a whole series of cases. The mathematician cannot force the issue by inventing a new property, say that 2 + 2 = 5, and then forcing the universe to conform to his formulation. (Of course, the written symbols such as 4 and 5 that denote the numbers could have been chosen differently. And a mathematician can define a new abstract object to have properties that he chooses. But we do not “choose” the properties of natural numbers.) Natural numbers conform to arithmetical properties and laws that are already there, laws that are discovered rather than invented. The laws must already be there. 2 + 2 = 4 must actually hold. It must “have teeth.” If it is truly universal, it is not violated. Two apples and two apples always make four apples. No event escapes the “hold” or dominion of arithmetical laws. The power of these laws is absolute, in fact, infinite. In classical language, the law is omnipotent (“all powerful”).

2 + 2 = 4 is both transcendent and immanent. It transcends the creatures of the world by exercising power over them, conforming them to its dictates. It is immanent in that it touches and holds in its dominion even the smallest bits of this world.4 2 + 2 = 4 transcends the galactic clusters and is immanently present in the behavior of the electrons surrounding a beryllium nucleus. Transcendence and immanence are characteristics of God.

The Personal Character of Law

Many agnostics and atheists by this time will be looking for a way of escape. It seems that the key concept of arithmetical truth is beginning to look suspiciously like the biblical idea of God. The most obvious escape, and the one that has rescued many from spiritual discomfort, is to deny that arithmetical truth is personal. It is just there as an impersonal something.

Throughout the ages people have tried such routes. They have constructed idols, substitutes for God. In ancient times, the idols often had the form of statues representing a god—Poseidon, the god of the sea, or Mars, the god of war. Nowadays in the Western world we are more sophisticated. Idols now take the form of mental constructions of a god or a God-substitute. Money and pleasure can become idols. So can “humanity” or “nature” when it receives a person’s ultimate allegiance. “Scientific law,” when it is viewed as impersonal, becomes another God-substitute. Arithmetical truth, as a particular kind of scientific law, is also viewed as impersonal. In both ancient times and today, idols conform to the imagination of the one who makes them. Idols have enough similarities to the true God to be plausible, but differ so as to allow us comfort and the satisfaction of manipulating the substitutes that we construct.

In fact, however, a close look at 2 + 2 = 4 shows that this escape route is not really plausible. Law implies a law-giver. Someone must think the law and enforce it, if it is to be effective. But if some people resist this direct move to personality, we may move more indirectly.

Scientists and mathematicians in practice believe passionately in the rationality of scientific laws and arithmetical laws. We are not dealing with something totally irrational, unaccountable, and unanalyzable, but with lawfulness that in some sense is accessible to human understanding. Rationality is a sine qua non for scientific law. But, as we know, rationality belongs to persons, not to rocks, trees, and subpersonal creatures. If the law is rational, as mathematicians assume it is, then it is also personal.

Scientists and mathematicians also assume that laws can be articulated, expressed, communicated, and understood through human language. Mathematical work includes not only rational thought but symbolic communication. Now, the original law, the law 2 + 2 = 4 that is “out there,” is not known to be written or uttered in a human language. But it must be expressible in language in our secondary description. It must be translatable into not only one but many human languages. We may explain the meaning of the symbols and the significance and application of 2 + 2 = 4 through clauses, phrases, explanatory paragraphs, and contextual explanations in human language.

Arithmetical laws are clearly like human utterances in their ability to be grammatically articulated, paraphrased, translated, and illustrated.5 Law is utterance-like, language-like. And the complexity of utterances that we find among mathematicians, as well as among human beings in general, is not duplicated in the animal world.6 Language is one of the defining characteristics that separates man from animals. Language, like rationality, belongs to persons. It follows that arithmetical laws are in essence personal.7

The Incomprehensibility of Law

In addition, law is both knowable and incomprehensible in the theological sense. That is, we know arithmetical truths, but in the midst of this knowledge there remain unfathomed depths and unanswered questions about the very areas where we know the most. Why does 2 + 2 = 4 hold everywhere?

The knowability of laws is closely related to their rationality and their immanence, displayed in the accessibility of effects. We experience incomprehensibility in the fact that the increase of mathematical understanding only leads to ever deeper questions: “How can this be?” and “Why this law rather than many other ways that the human mind can imagine?” The profundity and mystery in mathematical discoveries can only produce awe—yes, worship—if we have not blunted our perception with hubris (Isa. 6:9–10).

Are We Divinizing Nature?

But now we must consider an objection. By claiming that arithmetical laws have divine attributes, are we divinizing nature? That is, are we taking something out of the created world and falsely claiming that it is divine? Are not arithmetical laws a part of the created world? Should we not classify them as creature rather than Creator?8

I suspect that the specificity of arithmetical laws, their obvious reference to the created world, has become the occasion for many of us to infer that these laws are a part of the created world. But such an inference is clearly invalid. The speech describing a butterfly is not itself a butterfly or a part of a butterfly. Speech referring to the created world is not necessarily an ontological part of the world to which it refers.

The Bible indicates that God rules the world through his speech.9 He speaks, and it is done:

By the word of the LORD the heavens were made,

and by the breath of his mouth...