To Gaze upon God (eBook)

The Beatific Vision in Doctrine, Tradition, and Practice
eBook Download: EPUB
2024 | 1. Auflage
248 Seiten
IVP Academic (Verlag)
978-1-5140-0767-9 (ISBN)

Lese- und Medienproben

To Gaze upon God -  Samuel Parkison
Systemvoraussetzungen
27,23 inkl. MwSt
  • Download sofort lieferbar
  • Zahlungsarten anzeigen
Today, the doctrine of the beatific vision has been woefully forgotten within the church and its theology. Yet, throughout history Christians have always held that the blessed hope of heaven lies in seeing and being in the presence of God, of beholding the beatific vision. With lucidity and breadth, Parkison reintroduces the beatific vision and affirms its centrality for the life of the church today. Parkison argues for the beatific vision's biblical foundations and reminds us-through close readings of theologians such as Anselm of Canterbury, Thomas Aquinas, Dante, Gregory Palamas, John Calvin, and Jonathan Edwards-of the doctrine's historical and contemporary significance. The beatific vision is about seeing God, and as Christians have acknowledged across the tradition, seeing God is our ultimate end.

Samuel G. Parkison (PhD Midwestern Seminary) is Associate Professor of Theological Studies at Gulf Theological Seminary in the United Arab Emirates. He is the author of several books, including Proclaiming the Triune God: The Doctrine of the Trinity in the Life of the Church (co-author), as well as Thinking Christianly: Bringing Sundry Thoughts Captive to Christ, and Irresistible Beauty: Beholding Triune Glory in the Face of Jesus Christ.

Samuel G. Parkison (PhD Midwestern Seminary) is Associate Professor of Theological Studies at Gulf Theological Seminary in the United Arab Emirates. He is the author of several books, including Proclaiming the Triune God: The Doctrine of the Trinity in the Life of the Church (co-author), as well as Thinking Christianly: Bringing Sundry Thoughts Captive to Christ, and Irresistible Beauty: Beholding Triune Glory in the Face of Jesus Christ.

1


What Is the Beatific Vision?


WHAT MAKES HEAVEN, HEAVEN? Christianity’s resounding answer to that question throughout the centuries has been the beatific vision. This is no exaggeration. In fact, the beatific vision is one of the few doctrines that can truly boast ecumenical status; it is not the exclusive doctrine of Eastern Orthodoxy, nor Roman Catholicism, nor Protestantism—the beatific vision is the blessed hope of the one, holy, catholic, and apostolic church. This is not to suggest that each of these traditions has no unique contribution to make. As we will see in this book, there are variations of how the beatific vision is articulated within the various rooms of mere Christianity’s house (to use C. S. Lewis’s analogy).1 But for all its variegated formulations to the precise nature of the beatific vision, Christian tradition speaks in unison when it declares that the hope of heaven is the blessed vision of God. The overwhelming majority of Christians throughout the ages have said with Paul, “For now we see in a mirror dimly, but then face to face. Now I know in part; then I shall know fully, even as I have been fully known” (1 Cor 13:12).2 What makes heaven, heaven is that there we shall see the face of God. That blessed vision is the culmination of all our godly enjoyments in this life and the satiation of all our desire. That blessed vision is the Promised Land we march on toward, and the consolation that sustains us on our pilgrimage. We shall see God. While Christians have many desires and aspirations, the central point of every single one of them is the same as David’s: “One thing have I asked of the LORD, that will I seek after: that I may dwell in the house of the LORD all the days of my life, to gaze upon the beauty of the LORD and to inquire in his temple” (Ps 27:4).

In this sense, the book you hold in your hand is a (small “c”) catholic book. My prayer is that the majority of what I write here will elicit a hearty “amen” from all Christians. In another sense, however, it has a narrower focus. I write as a Reformed evangelical, and it is other Reformed evangelicals I particularly address.3 This is fitting, in part, because the widespread Christian consensus on the beatific vision I describe here is only true if we use the wide-angled lens of two millennia. If our focus is on the past couple hundred years of evangelicalism, and indeed, the status quo over the past couple of decades, we will find a conspicuous absence of discussion on beatific vision. There are many reasons for this, and we shall address them in due course (particularly in chap. 5), but here we must simply acknowledge that the beatific vision is bound to be a new doctrine for many an evangelical. So, while this book is broad in the sense that I hope to retrieve a catholic doctrine that has enjoyed far-reaching consensus for the majority of the church’s history, it is narrow in the sense that I hope to apply it in the particular context of Protestant and Reformed evangelicalism. This will simultaneously allow for us evangelicals to remember our catholic heritage, while also contributing to that catholic tradition by connecting the beatific vision with our theological distinctives (particularly, our soteriological distinctives).

In this present chapter, I will develop the theological foundations that support the beatific vision, as well as lay out the broad contours of the doctrine itself. As a final word of preface, it is worth mentioning that while evangelicals (particularly of the Reformed variety like myself) may be unfamiliar with the doctrine of the beatific vision consciously speaking, they are probably already primed and ready to embrace it. In fact, they may even believe it without knowing as much. “Christian hedonists” who have learned from John Piper that “God is most glorified in us when we are most satisfied in him”—those who have come to agree with Piper that the chief delight of the soul is “seeing and savoring Christ”—are ready to embrace the beatific vision.4 If one has learned from C. S. Lewis to ache for “the stab of joy,”5 to reject playing with mud-pies in the slums for the sake of a holiday at sea,6 and to go joyfully “further up and further in” to Aslan’s country forever,7 one is ready to embrace the beatific vision. If one has learned from Jonathan Edwards that heaven is “a world of love,” one is ready to embrace the beatific vision.8 If one has learned to pray with Augustine, “Thou hast made us for Thyself, and our hearts are restless until they find their rest in Thee,”9 one is ready for the beatific vision. All of these lessons that so many Reformed evangelicals have learned traffic in the blessed hope of the beatific vision. They may therefore proceed in confidence.

WHY A BOOK ON THE BEATIFIC VISION?


There are reasons why this doctrine, and indeed, this way of talking about heaven, feels so foreign for us who live in the twenty-first century. The radical individualism produced by the Enlightenment has yielded strange fruit that may lead us to think that any examination of the beatific vision is irrelevant today. In his brief and infamous essay, “What Is Enlightenment?,” Immanuel Kant (1772–1804) answers his own question in this way:

Enlightenment is man’s leaving his self-caused immaturity. Immaturity is the incapacity to use one’s intelligence without the guidance of another. Such immaturity is self-caused if it is not caused by lack of intelligence, but by lack of determination and courage to use one’s intelligence without being guided by another. Sapere aude! [“Dare to know!”] “Have the courage to use your own intelligence” is therefore the motto of the enlightenment.10

Tradition, according to the spirit of Enlightenment, is a straight jacket, confining the would-be liberated intellect to immaturity. Growing into intellectual adulthood, for Kant, is one and the same with waking from one’s dogmatic slumber and voyaging out on an open-ended quest for independent thought.

One of the surprising fruits of this “motto,” so aptly summarized by Kant, is the fundamentalist-biblicist misrepresentation of sola Scriptura. I say “misrepresentation” because the Reformers never intended for the doctrine of sola Scriptura to sever Christians from their heritage. “Far from undergirding an individualistic or biblistic portrayal of Christianity,” note Michael Allen and Scott Swain, “sola Scriptura operated within a catholic context that shaped the confessional, catechetical, and liturgical life of the early Reformed churches.”11 No, the contemporary antipathy for tradition that often accompanies fundamentalism and a biblicist approach to theology did not come from sola Scriptura; modernity and the Enlightenment are to blame for this aberration from historic Christianity. This means that the problem with fundamentalism is not that it is too conservative but rather that it is not nearly conservative enough; it is willing to conserve premodern concepts like the Reformation’s solas or Nicene Trinitarian categories of consubstantiality but not the premodern hermeneutic or philosophical commitments that went into the original articulation of such convictions. But we cannot expect to retain Reformational or Nicene fruit with an Enlightenment root.

This consideration of the Enlightenment is relevant for justifying a book like this in a time like the one in which it is written. In an age as unpredictable and unsettled as ours, it might seem inappropriate for Christian theologians to devote concentrated attention on anything other than the pressing social issues of our day. Gavin Ortlund summarizes the starkness of our situation well: “Athanasius stood contra mundum; Aquinas synthesized Aristotle; Luther strove with his conscience; Zwingli wielded an axe; but probably none of them ever dreamed of a world in which people could choose their gender. Secularizing late modernity is a strange, new animal.”12 Late modernity is a “strange, new animal” for other reasons as well. For example, Joseph Minich has recently demonstrated that in light of the insights gained by thinkers like Charles Taylor’s reflections on “the immanent frame,”13 late modernity is marked by a particular existential sense of divine absence.14

In the face of such a “strange, new animal,” should not the theologians of Christ’s church devote all their attention to answering questions surrounding personhood, gender, sexuality, and human nature? If (in incredibly broad and crude strokes) the fourth century was when the church was forced to articulate its convictions on the Trinity, the fifth century was when the church was forced to articulate its convictions on Christology, the medieval period was when the church was forced to articulate its metaphysics, and the sixteenth century was when the church was forced to articulate its convictions on revelation, Scripture, and soteriology, perhaps the twenty-first century is when the church will be forced to articulate its convictions on anthropology and sexuality. So, why write a book on retrieving the doctrine of the beatific vision when books on, say, anthropology and sexuality, for example, are sorely needed?

One answer—apart from simply granting that such treatments are necessary and should be commended as some theologians produce them—is that this is easier said than done. Christians in the twenty-first century, facing the perplexing concerns surrounding...

Erscheint lt. Verlag 3.9.2024
Verlagsort Lisle
Sprache englisch
Themenwelt Religion / Theologie Christentum Kirchengeschichte
Schlagworte Anselm • Anselm of Canterbury • Aquinas • Baptist • Baptist theology • beatific vision • Bible • Biblical • Calvin • Canterbury • Christianity • Church • Classical • Dante Alighieri • Doctrine • Early modern • early modern theology • Global • GREGORY PALAMAS • John Calvin • Jonathan Edwards • Medieval • Medieval theology • modern theology • Patristic • patristic theology • Reformation • Scripture • seeing • seminary • seminary student • Student • Theologian • Theology • Thomas Aquinas
ISBN-10 1-5140-0767-3 / 1514007673
ISBN-13 978-1-5140-0767-9 / 9781514007679
Haben Sie eine Frage zum Produkt?
EPUBEPUB (Wasserzeichen)

DRM: Digitales Wasserzeichen
Dieses eBook enthält ein digitales Wasser­zeichen und ist damit für Sie persona­lisiert. Bei einer missbräuch­lichen Weiter­gabe des eBooks an Dritte ist eine Rück­ver­folgung an die Quelle möglich.

Dateiformat: EPUB (Electronic Publication)
EPUB ist ein offener Standard für eBooks und eignet sich besonders zur Darstellung von Belle­tristik und Sach­büchern. Der Fließ­text wird dynamisch an die Display- und Schrift­größe ange­passt. Auch für mobile Lese­geräte ist EPUB daher gut geeignet.

Systemvoraussetzungen:
PC/Mac: Mit einem PC oder Mac können Sie dieses eBook lesen. Sie benötigen dafür die kostenlose Software Adobe Digital Editions.
eReader: Dieses eBook kann mit (fast) allen eBook-Readern gelesen werden. Mit dem amazon-Kindle ist es aber nicht kompatibel.
Smartphone/Tablet: Egal ob Apple oder Android, dieses eBook können Sie lesen. Sie benötigen dafür eine kostenlose App.
Geräteliste und zusätzliche Hinweise

Buying eBooks from abroad
For tax law reasons we can sell eBooks just within Germany and Switzerland. Regrettably we cannot fulfill eBook-orders from other countries.

Mehr entdecken
aus dem Bereich