Juan de Torquemada

Thomas M. Izbicki, Ph.D. (Cornell University, 1973), is a humanities librarian emeritus at Rutgers University. He is a researcher in the fields of medieval canon law, the history of the papacy, and the history of the Order of Preachers. He has published Protector of the Faith: Cardinal Johannes de Turrecremata and the Defense of the Institutional Church (1981) and The Eucharist in Medieval Canon Law (2015). Jorge Ledo, Ph.D. (University of Aberdeen, 2009), is a ‘Ramón y Cajal’ Researcher at the Universidade da Coruña (Spain). He is an intellectual historian specialized in Renaissance Humanism and in the history of religious minorities and religious dissidence in early-modern Spain. He has published Moria de Erasmo Roterodamo. A Critical Edition of the Early Modern Spanish Translation of Erasmus's Encomium Moriae (2014).

Acknowledgments



Introduction: Juan de Torquemada’s Defense of the Conversos

 1 The Revolt in Toledo, 1449

 2 The Manuscripts, Editions and Translation

 3 Conspectus siglorum



Tract against the Midianites and Ishmaelites, Foes and Detractors of the Faithful Who Originated from the Israelite People

 [Prologue]

 1 In Which It Is Shown from a Description of the Quality of the Aforesaid Trial That It Is of No Force or Moment

 2 In Which the Things Cited against Christ’s Faithful Descended from the Israelite People Are Proved to Be Erroneous

 3 In Which It Is Shown That the Second Foundation Cited by the Foe in Favor of Their Impiety against Those Newly Converted to Christ’s Faith Descended from the Israelite Nation Is Erroneous and Blasphemous

 4 In Which the Aforesaid Error Is Refuted in a Second Way, with Reasons

 5 In Which the Aforesaid Error Is Reproved from the Divine Promises Made to the Israelite People

 6 In Which the Aforesaid Error Is Reproved from the Deeds Done by Christ among the Jewish People

 7 In Which One Authority Cited in Favor and Proof of Their Aforesaid Errors Is Answered

 8 In Which the Second Authority Cited on the Part of the Foe Is Answered

 9 In Which the Third Authority Cited for the Adverse Part Is Answered

 10 In Which the Fourth Authority Cited for the Adverse Part Is Answered

 11 In Which the Fifth Passage Cited by the Often-Mentioned Midianites and Ishmaelites in Favor and Support of Their Sacrilegious Presumption Is Answered

 12 In Which the Principal Conclusion of the Foe Is Shown from the above to Be False and Erroneous

 13 That the Unbelief of Those from Whom They Descend Must Not Be Imputed to Those Converted to Christ’s Faith from the People of the Jews

 14 In Which Reasons Are Assigned Why Converts to Christ’s Faith, and Especially Those from the Israelite People, Are Not to Be Despised by the Other Faithful, but Rather Loved and Honored

 15 In Which the Error and Malice of Those Who Presume to Posit a Difference between Those Converted from the Israelite People and Other Christians Is Confuted

 16 In Which Those Things Which the Aforesaid Adversaries Cite in Favor of Their Rashness Are Answered



Appendix: Pope Nicholas V: Humani generis inimicus (Fabriano, 24 September 1449)

Bibliography

Index of Scripture References

Index of Classical and Medieval Authors

Index of Scholars Cited