The Semantics of Word Division in Northwest Semitic Writing Systems - Robert S.D. Crellin

The Semantics of Word Division in Northwest Semitic Writing Systems

Ugaritic, Phoenician, Hebrew, Moabite and Greek
Buch | Hardcover
256 Seiten
2021
Oxbow Books (Verlag)
978-1-78925-677-2 (ISBN)
62,35 inkl. MwSt
Presents an important new approach to key aspects of early language by considering the targets of graphic word-level units in natural language, focusing on ancient North West Semitic (NWS) writing systems.
Much focus in research on alphabetic writing systems has been on correspondences between graphemes and phonemes. The present study sets out to complement these by examining the linguistic denotation of markers of word division in several ancient Northwest Semitic (NWS) writing systems, namely, Ugaritic, Phoenician, Moabite, and Hebrew, as well as alphabetic Greek. While in Modern European languages words on the page are separated on the basis of morphosyntax, I argue that in most NWS writing systems words are divided on the basis of prosody: ‘words’ are units which must be pronounced together with a single primary accent or stress, or as a single phrase.

After an introduction providing the necessary theoretical groundwork, Part I considers word division in Phoenician inscriptions. I show that word division at the levels of both the prosodic word and of the prosodic phrase may be found in Phoenician, and that the distributions match those of prosodic words and prosodic phrases in Tiberian Hebrew. The latter is a source where, unlike the rest of the material considered, the prosody is well represented. In Part II, word division in Ugaritic alphabetic cuneiform is analysed. Here two-word division strategies are identified, corresponding broadly to two genres of text: viz, literary, and administrative documents. Word division in the orthography of literary and of some other texts separates prosodic words. By contrast, in many administrative (and some other) documents, words are separated on the basis of morphosyntax, anticipating later word division strategies in Europe by several centuries. Part III considers word division in the consonantal text of the Masoretic tradition of Biblical Hebrew. Here word division is found to mark out ‘minimal prosodic words’. I show that this word division orthography is also found in early Moabite and Hebrew inscriptions. Word division in alphabetic Greek inscriptions is the topic of Part IV. Whilst it is agreed that word division marks out prosodic words, the precise relationship of these units to the pitch accent and the rhythm of the language is not so clear, and consequently this issue is addressed in detail. Finally, the Epilogue considers the societal context of word division in each of the writing systems examined, to attempt to discern the rationales for the prosodic word division strategies adopted.

Contexts of and Relations between Early Writing Systems (CREWS) is a project funded by the European Research Council under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement No. 677758), and based in the Faculty of Classics, University of Cambridge.

Robert Crellin is a research associate at the University of Cambridge. He completed his PhD in Ancient Greek linguistics in 2012, and has since worked and written on various aspects of the linguistics of Indo-European and Semitic languages.

Acknowledgements

Abbreviations

 

1. Introduction

1.1. What is a word?

1.2. Why Northwest Semitic and Greek?

1.3. Wordhood in writing systems research

1.4. Linguistic levels of wordhood

1.5. Word division at the syntax-phonology interface

1.6. Previous scholarship

1.7. Method

1.8. Outline

 

Part I Phoenician

2. Introduction

2.1. Overview

2.2. Literature review

2.3. Corpus

2.4. Linguistic and sociocultural identity of the inscriptions

2.5. Proto-alphabetic

2.6. Shared characteristics of word division

2.7. Divergence in word division practice

 

3. Prosodic words

3.1. Introduction

3.2. Distribution of word division

3.3. Graphematic weight of function words

3.4. Morphosyntax of univerbated syntagms

3.5. Sandhi assimilation

3.6. Comparison of composition and distribution with prosodic words in Tiberian Hebrew

3.7. Conclusion

 

4. Prosodic phrase division

4.1. Introduction

4.2. Syntax of univerbated syntagms

4.3. Comparison with prosodic phrases in Tiberian Hebrew

4.4. Syntactic vs. prosodic phrase level analysis

4.5. Verse form

4.6. Conclusion

 

Part II Ugaritic alphabetic cuneiform

5. Introduction

5.1. Overview

5.2. Literature review

5.3. Basic patterns of word division and univerbation

5.4. Exceptions to the basic patterns of word division

5.5. Line division

5.6. Contexts of use

5.7. Textual issues

5.8. Inconsistent nature of univerbation

5.9. Hypothesis: Graphematic words represent actual prosodic words

 

6. The Ugaritic ‘Majority’ orthography

6.1. Introduction

6.2. Syntagms particularly associated with univerbation

6.3. Univerbation with nouns

6.4. Univerbation with verbs

6.5. Univerbation with suffix pronouns

6.6. Univerbation at clause and phrase boundaries

6.7. Summary

 

7. Quantitative comparison of Ugaritic and Tiberian Hebrew

7.1. Introduction

7.2. Corpus

7.3. Frequency of occurrence

7.4. Length of phrase

7.5. Quantifying the morphosyntactic collocation of linking features

7.6. Measuring Association Score B for Ugaritic and Tiberian Hebrew

7.7. Visualising morphosyntactic collocation of linking features with MDS

7.8. Conclusion

 

8. Semantics of word division in the Ugaritic ‘Majority’ orthography: prosodic word or prosodic phrase

8.1. Introduction

8.2. Graphematic wordhood in the Ugaritic ‘Majority’ orthography

8.3. Consistency of the representation of ACTUAL PROSODIC WORDHOOD in Ugaritic

8.4. Univerbation at clause boundaries

8.5. Adoption of the ‘Majority’ orthography outside of literary contexts

 

9. Separation of prefix clitics

9.1. Introduction

9.2. Literary texts

9.3. Non-literary texts adopting the ‘Majority’ orthography

9.4. Non-literary texts adopting the ‘Minority’ orthography

9.5. Conclusion

 

Part III Hebrew and Moabite

10. Introduction

10.1. Introduction

10.2. Morphosyntactic status of graphematic affixes in Tiberian Hebrew

10.3. Morphosyntactic status of graphematic affixes

10.4. Graphematic status of graphematic affixes

10.5. Conclusion

 

11. Word division in the consonantal Masoretic Text: Minimal prosodic words

11.1. Introduction

11.2. Combining prosody and morphosyntax (Dresher 1994; Dresher 2009)

11.3. Accounting for graphematic wordhood prosodically

11.4. מַה‎ mah “What?”

11.5. לֹא‎ lōʾ

11.6. Minimal domains for stress assignment and sandhi

11.7. Conclusion

 

12. Minimal prosodic words in epigraphic Hebrew and Moabite

12.1. Introduction

12.2. Siloam Tunnel inscription

12.3. Meshaʿ stelae (KAI 181 and KAI 30)

12.4. Accounting for word division in the Meshaʿ and Siloam inscriptions

12.5. Conclusion

12.6. Conclusion to Part III

 

Part IV Epigraphic Greek

13. Introduction

13.1. Overview

13.2. Corpus

13.3. Prosodic wordhood in Ancient Greek

13.4. Metre and natural language

13.5. Problems with identifying graphematic words with prosodic words

13.6. Conclusion

 

14. The pitch accent and prosodic words

14.1. Introduction

14.2. Prosody of postpositives and enclitics

14.3. Prosody of prepositives and ‘proclitics’

14.4. Conclusion

 

15. Domains of pitch accent and rhythm

15.1. Introduction

15.2. Challenging the inherited tradition of accentuation

15.3. Pitch accentuation and rhythmic prominence have different domains

15.4. Rhythmic words are canonically trimoraic or greater

15.5. Graphematic words correspond to rhythmic words

15.6. Conclusion

 

16. Graphematic words with multiple lexicals

16.1. Introduction

16.2. Inconsistency of levels of graphematic representation

16.3. Prosodic subordination of one lexical to another

16.4. Punctuating canonical rhythmic words

16.5. Conclusion

 

17. Conclusion: The context of word division

17.1. Overview

17.2. Orality and literacy

17.3. Prosodic word level punctuation is a function of the oral performance of texts

 

Bibliography

Erscheinungsdatum
Reihe/Serie Contexts of and Relations Between Early Writing Systems ; 4
Zusatzinfo B/w
Verlagsort Oxford
Sprache englisch
Maße 170 x 240 mm
Themenwelt Geschichte Allgemeine Geschichte Vor- und Frühgeschichte
Geschichte Hilfswissenschaften Paläografie
Geisteswissenschaften Geschichte Regional- / Ländergeschichte
Geisteswissenschaften Sprach- / Literaturwissenschaft Sprachwissenschaft
ISBN-10 1-78925-677-1 / 1789256771
ISBN-13 978-1-78925-677-2 / 9781789256772
Zustand Neuware
Haben Sie eine Frage zum Produkt?
Mehr entdecken
aus dem Bereich
auf den Spuren der frühen Zivilisationen

von Harald Haarmann

Buch | Hardcover (2023)
C.H.Beck (Verlag)
20,00
die letzten 43000 Jahre

von Karin Bojs

Buch | Hardcover (2024)
C.H.Beck (Verlag)
26,00