Democratizing Constitutional Law

I Challenging and Defending JudicialReview.- 1. Randomized Judicial Review; Andrei Marmor.- 2. On the Difficulty toGround the Authority of Constitutional Courts: Can Strong Judicial Review beMorally Justified?; Thomas Bustamante.- 3. The Reasons without Vote: TheRepresentative and Majoritarian Function of Constitutional Courts; Luís RobertoBarroso.- II Constitutional Dialogues and Constitutional Deliberation.- 4.Decoupling Judicial Review From Judicial Supremacy; Stephen Gardbaum.- 5. Scopeand limits of dialogic constitutionalism; Roberto Gargarella.- 6. A Defence ofa Broader Sense of Constitutional Dialogues based on Jeremy Waldron's Criticismon Judicial Review; Bernardo Gonçalves Fernandes.- III Institutional Alternativesfor Constitutional Changes.- 7. New Institutional Mechanisms for Making ConstitutionalLaw; Mark Tushnet.- 8. Democratic Constitutional Change: AssessingInstitutional Possibilities; Christopher Zurn.- 9. The Unconstitutionality ofConstitutional Changesin Colombia: a Tension between Majoritatian andConstitutional Democracy; Gonzalo Ramírez Cleves.- IV Constitutional Promisesand Democratic Participation.- 10. Is there such thing as a radical constitution?;Vera Karam de Chueiri.- 11. Judicial reference to community values - A pointertowards constitutional juries?; Eric Ghosh.- V Legal Theory and ConstitutionalInterpretation.- 12. Common Law Constitutionalism and the Written Constitution;Wil Waluchow and Katharina Stevens.- 13. On how law is not like chess - Dworkinand the theory of conceptual types; Ronaldo Porto Macedo Júnior.