Deontic Modality

Nate Charlow works primarily on language, semantics, and related issues in meta-ethics and epistemology. He wrote a dissertation on imperatives (and deontic modals) at the University of Michigan, and has taught at the University of Toronto since 2011. His interest in imperatives and deontic modals is both linguistic and philosophical. He has published on the a priori; the semantics of conditionals, imperatives, and modals; and Expressivism. Matthew Chrisman has taught Philosophy at the University of Edinburgh since 2006, before which he did his PhD at the University of North Carolina. He works primarily on ethical theory, philosophy of language, and epistemology. He has published The Meaning of 'Ought' with Oxford University Press and articles in journals including the Journal of Philosophy, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, Philosophical Studies, and Philosophers' Imprint.

Nate Charlow and Matthew Chrisman: Introduction
1: Fabrizio Cariani: Deontic Modals and Probabilities: One Theory to Rule Them All?
2: Nate Charlow: Decision Theory: Yes! Truth Conditions: No!
3: Daniel Lassiter: Linguistic and Philosophical Considerations on Bayesian Semantics
4: Aaron Bronfman and J. L. Dowell: Contextualism about Deontic Conditionals
5: Ralph Wedgwood: Objective and Subjective 'Ought'
6: Stephen Finlay: Ought Out of Order
7: Jessica Rett: On a Shared Property of Deontic and Epistemic Modals
8: Seth Yalcin: Modalities of Normality
9: Paul Portner and Aynat Rubinstein: Extreme and Non-Extreme Deontic Modals
10: Benj Hellie: Rationalization and the Ross Paradox
11: Malte Willer: Dynamic Foundations for Deontic Logic
12: William Starr: Dynamic Expressivism about Deontic Modality
13: Matthew Chrisman: Metanormative Theory and the Meaning of Deontic Modals