The Poverty of Conceptual Truth - R. Lanier Anderson

The Poverty of Conceptual Truth

Kant's Analytic/Synthetic Distinction and the Limits of Metaphysics
Buch | Hardcover
428 Seiten
2015
Oxford University Press (Verlag)
978-0-19-872457-5 (ISBN)
139,95 inkl. MwSt
R. Lanier Anderson presents a new account of Kant's distinction between analytic and synthetic judgments, and provides it with a clear basis within traditional logic. He reconstructs compelling claims about the syntheticity of elementary mathematics, and re-animates Kant's arguments against traditional metaphysics in the Critique of Pure Reason.
The Poverty of Conceptual Truth is based on a simple idea. Kant's distinction between analytic and synthetic judgments underwrites a powerful argument against the metaphysical program of his Leibnizian-Wolffian predecessors--an argument from fundamental limits on its expressive power. In that tradition, metaphysics promised to reveal the deep rational structure of the world through a systematic philosophy consisting of strictly conceptual truths, which flow from a logically perspicuous relation of 'containment' among concepts. That is, all truths would be 'analytic,' in Kant's sense. Kant's distinction shows to the contrary that far reaching and scientifically indispensable parts of our knowledge of the world (including mathematics, the foundations of natural science, all knowledge from experience, and the central principles of metaphysics itself) are essentially synthetic and could never be restated in analytic form. Thus, the metaphysics of Kant's predecessors is doomed, because knowledge crucial to any adequate theory of the world cannot even be expressed in the idiom to which it restricts itself (and which was the basis of its claim to provide a transparently rational account of things). Traditional metaphysics founders on the expressive poverty of conceptual truth.
To establish these claims, R. Lanier Anderson shows how Kant's distinction can be given a clear basis within traditional logic, and traces Kant's long, difficult path to discovering it. Once analyticity is framed in clear logical terms, it is possible to reconstruct compelling arguments that elementary mathematics must be synthetic, and then to show how similar considerations about irreducible syntheticity animate Kant's famous arguments against traditional metaphysics in the Critique of Pure Reason.

R. Lanier Anderson is Associate Professor of Philosophy (and by courtesy, of German Studies) at Stanford University, where he currently chairs the Philosophy Department. He works in the history of late modern philosophy with primary focus on Kant and nineteenth century philosophy, and is the author of a numerous articles about Kant, Nietzsche, and the neo-Kantian movement. His other research interests include Nietzsche's moral psychology and various topics in the philosophy of Montaigne.

PART I-THE TRADITIONAL LOGIC OF CONCEPT CONTAINMENT AND ITS (ALLEGED) METAPHYSICAL IMPLICATIONS; PART II-A DIFFICULT BIRTH: THE EMERGENCE OF KANT'S ANALYTIC/SYNTHETIC DISTINCTION; PART III-INELIMINABLE SYNTHETIC TRUTH IN ELEMENTARY MATHEMATICS; PART IV-THE POVERTY OF CONCEPTUAL TRUTH AND THE MASTER ARGUMENT OF THE 'TRANSCENDENTAL DIALECTIC'; EPILOGUE

Erscheint lt. Verlag 5.2.2015
Verlagsort Oxford
Sprache englisch
Maße 163 x 240 mm
Gewicht 792 g
Themenwelt Geisteswissenschaften Philosophie Geschichte der Philosophie
Geisteswissenschaften Philosophie Metaphysik / Ontologie
Geisteswissenschaften Philosophie Philosophie der Neuzeit
ISBN-10 0-19-872457-8 / 0198724578
ISBN-13 978-0-19-872457-5 / 9780198724575
Zustand Neuware
Haben Sie eine Frage zum Produkt?
Mehr entdecken
aus dem Bereich
oder Das Leben Montaignes in einer Frage und zwanzig Antworten

von Sarah Bakewell

Buch | Softcover (2023)
C.H.Beck (Verlag)
18,00
Auf dem Weg zu einer Kultur der Bewusstheit | Mit mehr als 500 …

von Thomas Metzinger

Buch | Hardcover (2023)
Berlin Verlag
48,00