Feminist Judgments: Family Law Opinions Rewritten

Rachel Rebouché is Associate Dean for Research and Professor of Law at Temple University Beasley School of Law. She is an author on casebooks in family law and women and the law. She has also co-authored Governance Feminism: An Introduction and co-edited Governance Feminism: Notes from the Field. She has published on family law, health law, and reproductive rights in various journals and is currently working on a book on reproductive justice.

1. Introduction Rachel Rebouché; 2. Reynolds v. United States, 98 U.S. 145 (1879) Marie Failinger and Laura Kessler; 3. McGuire v. McGuire, 59 N.W.2d 336 (Neb. 1953) Mary Anne Case, Martha Ertman and Zvi Triger; 4. Dandridge v. Williams, 397 U.S. 471 (1970) Maya Manian and Susan Frelich Appleton; 5. Wisconsin v. Yoder, 406 U.S. 205 (1972) Lisa Fishbayn Joffe and Kristen Murray; 6. Marvin v. Marvin, 557 P.2d 106 (Cal. 1976) Aníbal Rosario Lebrón and Kate Sablosky Elengold; 7. Kulko v. Superior Court, 436 U.S. 84 (1978) Mary-Beth Moylan and Katherine Macfarlane; 8. Daly v. Daly, 715 P.2d 56 (Nev. 1986) Raff Donelson and Nancy Polikoff; 9. Michael H. v. Gerald D., 491 U.S. 110 (1989) Suzanne Kim and Albertina Antognini; 10. DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social Services, 489 U.S. 189 (1989) Macarena Saez and Jessica Dixon Weaver; 11. Simeone v. Simeone, 581 A.2d 162 (Pa. 1990) Jamie Abrams and Alicia Kelly; 12. Borelli v. Brusseau, 12 Cal. App. 4th 647 (1993) June Carbone and Jo Carrillo; 13. Turner v. Rogers, 564 U.S. 431 (2011) Warren Binford and Elizabeth L. MacDowell; 14. In re T.J.S., 54 A.3d 263 (N.J. 2012) June Carbone and Seema Mohapatra; 15. Matter of A-B-, Respondent, 27 I&N Dec. 316 (A.G. 2018) Natalie Nanasi and Suzan M. Pritchett; 16. Sessions v. Morales-Santana, 2017 WL 2507339 (U.S. 2017) Cynthia Godsoe and Tracy Thomas.